Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

anyone running fp5s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 03:21 AM
  #1  
armaniranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: so cali cali
anyone running fp5s?

so i really like forced performance and am looking into getting there fp5s. is anyone running these? there website states they need springs and retainers so what are you guys running with them? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 05:00 AM
  #2  
EvoDom's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Joisey Shore
these cams are a very big set of cams, so be wise when you choose your cams. These particular cams arent reccomended on any turbo smaller then a 35r.

And idk if you've done your research on FP's cams but they are close to impossible to get to idle right, so if your car is a daily driver you might want to look somewhere else.

Dont get me wrong FP makes awsome cams and they make great power but they are just verh hard to get to idle normal, they need alot of RPM's to idle correct.

FP4R's are rated like a 274/272 i beleive
FP5R's are like a 282/280 i belive not 100% sure but both sets are nasty.

just search some beore purchase because i no alot of ppl had problems with idle and drivabilty.


Dom
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
armaniranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: so cali cali
ya man thanks.... i searched a decent amount but everyone has mentioned the fp4rs. theres not to much info on the fp5rs but thanks again
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #4  
1NastyMR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
M3's are good cams if your on a Big Turbo. Kelfords were tested to make great power but I've been reading the intake cam on the evo ix's like to snap so
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 02:44 PM
  #5  
jimib's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati Ohio
I have installed, driven, and tuned fp5rs. Of course this was in a full engine build, with Buschur Je Pistons. With these pistons there was plenty of valve to piston clearance in depth, but we used +1mm valves so there was not enough side clearance, and I had to cut the reliefs larger. You should never assume, but it looks like with Buschur JEs, and stock diameter valves you can use these cams for sure. There are reports of people using them in stock motors, but you need to check regardless.

They are awesome. Spool is near stock with the red. And I have it idling like stock at right around 1k. I have no experience with them in an 8, and cannot comment how they may idle in that situation. Over all I am certain that the car is idling and driving better than it did with the stock cams.

Cant wait to get a turbo on that car, that will necessitate spinning higher than 8-9k.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #6  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by EvoDom
these cams are a very big set of cams, so be wise when you choose your cams. These particular cams arent reccomended on any turbo smaller then a 35r.

And idk if you've done your research on FP's cams but they are close to impossible to get to idle right, so if your car is a daily driver you might want to look somewhere else.

Dont get me wrong FP makes awsome cams and they make great power but they are just verh hard to get to idle normal, they need alot of RPM's to idle correct.

FP4R's are rated like a 274/272 i beleive
FP5R's are like a 282/280 i belive not 100% sure but both sets are nasty.

just search some beore purchase because i no alot of ppl had problems with idle and drivabilty.


Dom

This post has a lot of inaccuracies and statements that are just plain wrong. Please do your homework before making blanket statements like these. FP cams work very well, and have no inherent tuning problems. That's a function of the tuner. FP5s are obviously more radical cams, and need someone who knows how to tune them to get the benefit they provide. As I recall, 9sec9 /OKIX runs the FP5s, and they work very well without idle problems.

The FP4s are less extreme than the FP5s, and came out well in the AMS cam test and a number of well known street cars.

Tuning idle is a function of knowing your computer and how to get the most out of it. Any non-stock cam will cause idle problems if not properly tuned...
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
jimib's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati Ohio
I wanted to add, all though we have aem ems for the car with the fp5r installed I got it to idle and drive like stock on the stock ecu.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #8  
MRfabolous's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
that is what i am wondering too i am looking for some more top end power i have a 6765 and all the supporting mods to be had and cosworth m2's my bottem end consists of ross pistons and oliver rods, and my head is built but not ported with ferrera dual springs and retainers lockers the whole 9 and supertech valves intake and exhaust will i have to grind the guides down for clearance or you guys think i will be fine if i switch to this 5r cams because i want somthing more aggressive and really there is nothing available for the IX. thanks
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 08:48 AM
  #9  
MRfabolous's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
bump from the dead for anyone that has any experience with these cams.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
dcshoeco16's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: MD
I have them on my car but as of yet I have not pushed them to their limit- they idle nicely around 1200~ that is on the stock computer. I have a new setup coming together soon and I will update to give more input as far as pushing these cams. I have mine with supertech stock size valves and springs with buschur JE pistons and no problems with clearance. They are definitely a top end cam and they come alive north of 4k let me know if you have any other questions
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 05:44 AM
  #11  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Originally Posted by MRfabolous
that is what i am wondering too i am looking for some more top end power i have a 6765 and all the supporting mods to be had and cosworth m2's my bottem end consists of ross pistons and oliver rods, and my head is built but not ported with ferrera dual springs and retainers lockers the whole 9 and supertech valves intake and exhaust will i have to grind the guides down for clearance or you guys think i will be fine if i switch to this 5r cams because i want somthing more aggressive and really there is nothing available for the IX. thanks
I run the 5r Cams with a 6765. Magnus cast intake, ported head etc. The car pulls hard to 9800+ no sign of dropping power off up top. The car has been over 150 on ~40 psi in at 3200 pounds so its making power.

You must check everything, I checked my ptv in multiple places and multiple degs of mivec control. I also do not think the super tech springs will handle these cams, I run kigglys stuff.

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 06:15 AM
  #12  
lillev23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
I wonder how well these can would work with a 2.4?. Fathouse, what it the compression on your motor? Had your head been resurfaced before?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 09:35 AM
  #13  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
I would say they would work really well in a 2.4

I run 9:1 weisco HD pistons, and yes the head has been decked a few times now. .5 mm+ valves.

Fathouse
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
lillev23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by Fathouse
I would say they would work really well in a 2.4

I run 9:1 weisco HD pistons, and yes the head has been decked a few times now. .5 mm+ valves.

Fathouse

Who did all your head work? I know there are some requirements in relation to the valve stem height and other things to be able to run the cams in a head that has been resurfaced before.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #15  
FathouseFab's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Marco at Magnus motorsports.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM.