Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What torque for manifold bolts/nuts - fsm conflics PICS inside!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Lightbulb What torque for manifold bolts/nuts - fsm conflics PICS inside!!

I'm slowly piecing together my BBK and tonight while looking at the FSM and torquing my manifold to turbo I noticed the book has two
different torque ratings for the 2 nuts and the 2 front studs. See pics. My question is what is everyone else torquing theres to? I don't want no leaks~!!

The first pic (most commonly showed one on EvoM) shows them to be torqued at 38 +/- 3 Check for circle



This second pic (from the engine overhaul section of the FSM) it shows them to be torqued at 47 +/- 3 which is a good 9 ft/lbs higher than the other page. Check for circle



Am I blind or what? It's taken from the Evo 9 cd so it should be good. I currently have them set to 40 ft/lbs but wanted to hear from others. Any help would be much appreciated!
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
Sievers's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Well the second is clearly for a IX. I do not know if anything was changed between the VIII and IX but that could be the difference but I have no idea. I went off the torque specs from the first.

What you have should be fine. I see no problem with that.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 05:11 AM
  #3  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
it doesn't matter, i always add 5ftlbs to the number in the FSM when it comes to non-internals.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 06:44 AM
  #4  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Thanks - I may bump it up a little bit to 45 or so. It's just weird how there is a ~10lb variance between the two pages and/or models. So far I haven't found any other torque rating out of the ordinary..
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 07:45 AM
  #5  
Sievers's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Yeah. let me know if you figure out anything more bro
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #6  
MasterNater's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 879
Likes: 27
From: Tupelo, MS
Well, in both pictures they used the same Newton Meter value of 64 +/- 5Nm. That's roughly 47 ft-lbs.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 PM.