Please explain header design in turbo applications...
Please explain header design in turbo applications...
I (Somewhat) understand header design for N/A vehicles and the value of equal length and short vs. long-tube headers but how much of this relates to design for turbo headers?
Do equal-length headers create any advantage/disadvantage to spool, power, engine-smoothness, etc.? Does their apparent added length hinder performance?
Does a shorter distance from the exhaust port to the turbocharger create any advantages?
Are there any other key facets of header design I should be aware of?
I ask because my curiousity was sparked by this comment from another thread:
Thanks for any help. I look forward to hearing from some aftermarket turbo-kit vendors especially (As well as some of the more turbo-knowledgeable members). I just want to make the most informed desicion when I upgrade.
Do equal-length headers create any advantage/disadvantage to spool, power, engine-smoothness, etc.? Does their apparent added length hinder performance?
Does a shorter distance from the exhaust port to the turbocharger create any advantages?
Are there any other key facets of header design I should be aware of?
I ask because my curiousity was sparked by this comment from another thread:
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Also the turbo is much more effective because it's right off the mainfold and Garret/Honeywell states that 70% of turbo energy is from exhaust heat. With the WRX and the long Header/uppipe combo it would lose allot of heat before it got to the turbo.
Also the turbo is much more effective because it's right off the mainfold and Garret/Honeywell states that 70% of turbo energy is from exhaust heat. With the WRX and the long Header/uppipe combo it would lose allot of heat before it got to the turbo.



