Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

6262 vs 6266.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #1  
aml15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
6262 vs 6266.

Hi.

I`m having a hard time choosing what turbo i should choose. i know there should not be much difference.. but just want to make the right choice..
So please lett me know what you think.

The 2 turbo`s i stand between is

6262 AR 0.82 t3 (CEA)
6266 AR 0.63 t3 (CEA)

This is to be used on a 2.1 liter engine at about 35-37psi and about 750-800crank.

Who would you choose? who do you think will make the most hp? Who will spool the fastest?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 05:15 PM
  #2  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Why get a bigger hot side and choke it off with a smaller AR. According to precision the 6266 should spool the same as the 6262 non cea.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 09:34 PM
  #3  
SDevo13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: SD
^^ Do NOT get a .63. Get a .82 with either of those turbos. The .63 will be a waste on either of those turbos as the increase in spool won't make up for how much it chokes you on the top end. I'd recommend the 6266, but I may be biased. I'm seeing 550wtq @ 5k rpms on e98 (2.3L).
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #4  
Turbotalon1g's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
I'd love to see a test of these 2 turbos both with a .82A/R hotside.

I think the 6262 would be a lot nicer and not act as lazy as the 6266 would, in the past turbos with equal sized wheels have gotten a lot better feedback that ones with a bigger exh. wheel.

Good luck.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
Evofiebre11's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: Rockland, New York
I own a 6262 billet DBB and i love it but i want more up top power and from the looks of it the 6266 is the answer if i didn't owner either i would buy 6266 but if you want a 6262 im selling mine has less than 1500miles i have warranty card and recipts for it PM me
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 03:52 PM
  #6  
lude2evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: texas
Originally Posted by Turbotalon1g
I'd love to see a test of these 2 turbos both with a .82A/R hotside.

I think the 6262 would be a lot nicer and not act as lazy as the 6266 would, in the past turbos with equal sized wheels have gotten a lot better feedback that ones with a bigger exh. wheel.

Good luck.
I have a jb 6262 and I'm switching to a 6266 jb both .82. I'll have more info in the coming months
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 06:39 PM
  #7  
Turbotalon1g's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
Originally Posted by lude2evo
I have a jb 6262 and I'm switching to a 6266 jb both .82. I'll have more info in the coming months
Awesome
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 07:24 PM
  #8  
brakeboost980's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: delaware
The best street combo up to 650 whp is a 6262 .63 ar.If you won't a bit more lag,and more top end pull then get the 6262 or 6266 in a .82.I ran the 6262 .63 ar in my stock 2.0 with fbo all supporting mods pump gas(93 oct) and made 575 whp at 30 psi with no addded back pressure and full boost at 5,100rpms..The .63 is good up to 650 whp before needed to go bigger.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
EvoDom's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Joisey Shore
I'm running a 6262 .63 ar and love it. I've made over 650 awhp on my 2.0 and spool is great. I've heard the 6266 .82 ar is a bit laggy compared to a 6262
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 07:32 PM
  #10  
lude2evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: texas
I have a 2.3 and see 32psi around 4700
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:27 PM
  #11  
brakeboost980's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Originally Posted by lude2evo
I have a 2.3 and see 32psi around 4700

Not a good example since you have a 2.3 rather then a 2.0 or 2.1 which yields in faster spool up.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #12  
yellowevo82's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 121
From: Mayfield, Pa
had a hta86 and was going to switch to the 6266 but i can't seem to get anybodys intell on a comparison
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 05:28 AM
  #13  
lude2evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: texas
Originally Posted by brakeboost980
Not a good example since you have a 2.3 rather then a 2.0 or 2.1 which yields in faster spool up.
Correct, but two posts above you state 30 psi@5100 on a 2.0l. So its fairly compable to each other.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 11:43 AM
  #14  
brakeboost980's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Originally Posted by lude2evo
Correct, but two posts above you state 30 psi@5100 on a 2.0l. So its fairly compable to each other.

Not really 400 rpms is a bid difference on the street when a car pulls up and your trying to hit full boost.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2012 | 11:45 AM
  #15  
lude2evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: texas
i agree, i dont mean to compare my 2.3 to a 2.0 only to say the turbo seems pretty consistant. if i had a dbb and twin scroll it might help with spool up also
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 AM.