Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Twin Scroll Vs. Standard Scroll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #46  
FOURCED's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
No, but its nothing special. Standard Garret divided T4 stuff from Turbonetics.

JDB
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #47  
AMS's Avatar
AMS
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
JDB! holy ****.. I recognize that name from the Turbo ford list.

I've played around with some twin scroll housings and it does make a slight difference. In fact the turbo I played with was the GT32 which comes supplied from Garrett with a twin scroll housing. I ran into some boost creep issues with it and without trying to go with twin gates I switched to a T3 housing. The spool up suffered by a little more than 100rpm but it was not very noticeable. Also for comparision I ran an ITS (innovative turbo system) dual BB T70 with a Q trim wheel and a twin scroll housing. We built a custom header for it and it ripped up well over 650whp. We then tried a plain journal bearing T72 GTQ wheeled (regular single scroll T4 housing) from PTE and it spooled a little quicker and made over 20whp more at the same boost level thanks to the new GT exhaust wheel. What I'm trying to say is that it's important to have the right combinations of wheels to make boost and power. A twin scroll housing is icing on the cake but it does require some work to use it to your advantage.
-Martin
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #48  
FOURCED's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Martin, good to hear from you and congratulations on your impressive performance in the EVO. I'll be calling you when I decide to get serious about mine!

Thanks for the input on the twin scroll testing. "Real info" from actual testing is hard to find.

JDB
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #49  
2k4EvoVIII's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: "Tri-Cities" WA
Ya thanx allot guys for the posts. Always good to hear first hand how it worked for you.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 10:46 AM
  #50  
Fenris Ulf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/Houston
Originally Posted by lancerpartstrad
IHI VF38 is reg. rotation ball bearing twin scroll. Those manifolds allready exist.
Post a link to the twin scroll evo manifold setup for regular rotation.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #51  
lancerpartstrad's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fenris Ulf
Post a link to the twin scroll evo manifold setup for regular rotation.
Sorry, that's my little secret. I'm sure some of these vendors will point you in the right direction.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 10:29 AM
  #52  
Brianb's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Here is a pulse converter manifold on an Alfa 2.0 turbo. The turbo is an old T04 converted to twin scroll. The primaries are ~30 inches and are ceramic coated stainless.

Originally the engine made 240 WHP @ 15 psi.
With the twin scroll the engine made 234 WHP @ 10 psi and 283 @ 15 psi. Lag was improved though I would like to see what a modern turbo would do... something like a GT 3017 or GT 3540 or something similar. Opinons...?

Fenris... you seem pretty knowledgeable here...



-Brian
Attached Thumbnails Twin Scroll Vs. Standard Scroll-pulse-header-top.jpg   Twin Scroll Vs. Standard Scroll-pulse-header-side.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #53  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
my engineering friends tell me that twin scroll hurts top end performance, so we run 4 to 1 merges on our racecars.







it made the whp show above on 1 bar and 1.8 liters.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #54  
wingnut's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Brew City
Talking



Full 1989 Dodge Shadow Variable Nozzle Turbo Glory. Came stock that way if I remember correctly.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 06:01 AM
  #55  
FOURCED's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
[QUOTE=EFIxMR]my engineering friends tell me that twin scroll hurts top end performance, so we run 4 to 1 merges on our racecars.



Its hard for me to believe you would be intersested in "top end performance" running an intercooler like that.

JDB
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #56  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
that air to water intercooler is made by laminova, and it is state of the art. no offense, but you don't know what you are talking about. mercedes benz runs a smaller version on their supercharged engines. another person with the same ic put down 700 whp.

Last edited by EFIxMR; Jan 20, 2005 at 11:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #57  
FOURCED's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Actually, I am very familiar with the Swedish made Opcon / Laminova product line. I bought one of their L/A oil coolers over 2 years ago and have one of their 2 year old catalogs in front of me now.

I stand by my statement above.

JDB
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #58  
Brianb's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
JDB... I am open to your opinion... what evidence to you have to support your statement?


-Brian

PS I am running an air/water IC too.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #59  
FOURCED's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
In OE applications such as Mercedes or the German Built GM Eco-Tec, they run 2 of the 45 MM by 332 MM cores for ~200HP applications. At the most, he could fit 4 of those cores in that housing making it efficient for ~4-500HP...... tops.
Now he wants to claim that someone has made ~800HP through that same intercooler..........I want to see that.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #60  
Brianb's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
JDB,

Comparative analysis can be effective at times... however in this instance I believe there are too many variables to substantiate your current position, that is why I asked for evidence, not anecdotal reference.



800BHP or more is easily achieved with an air-to-water IC. Questioning how long that power could be sustained would be a more telling question.



An equivalent to my motor (the Alfa above) has set a Land Speed Record at Bonneville running 24 psi and a small (ish) water-to-air IC. You should also know 35 pounds of ice was converted to gallons of warm water by the end of the run!



-Brian
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM.