EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)

- Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain-22/)

- - Kelford 280 vs BF272? (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain/545745-kelford-280-vs-bf272.html)

omniprobe

Mar 18, 2011 11:23 PM

Kelford 280 vs BF272?

This is on a 2.0 revving to 9.5k on a 67mm turbo. Anyone have some data?

1NastyMR

Mar 19, 2011 03:19 PM

I say BF 272 over a kelford.... but have you looked into s3s or tomei 280s or big cams like that?

mxguy1286

Mar 20, 2011 07:02 AM

Take it for what it is, comp280s vs buschur bf272s, same boost both cams set strait up. Buschur cams in red comp280s in the blue. Buschur cams where tested when it was about 20degrees cooler in the dyno room. http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...6/oldvsnew.jpg

doghouse

Jul 29, 2011 12:12 PM

BF272 has higher lift than kelford 272?

Derock2gspyder

Jul 31, 2011 05:33 PM

Kelfords any day! But yes check the gsc s3s there great cams as well

BenJ	Jul 31, 2011 05:42 PM

The S3's would make more power for sure, but I would go with the kelford 280's over the BF272's for the larger duration which will be helpful in the higher rpm's.

doghouse

Aug 6, 2011 05:15 PM

BF272 has higher lift than kelford 272?

Levar

Oct 30, 2011 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mxguy1286 (Post 9172179)

Interesting. The BF272s are smaller and were testing with cooler temperatures only to show slower spool characteristics while having similiar topend performance. This makes me want some GSC S2s even more. :crap:

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 AM.