EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Kelford 280 vs BF272?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2011, 11:23 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
omniprobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: hometown cali
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Kelford 280 vs BF272?
This is on a 2.0 revving to 9.5k on a 67mm turbo. Anyone have some data?
omniprobe is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 19, 2011, 03:19 PM
  #2  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (102)
 
1NastyMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say BF 272 over a kelford.... but have you looked into s3s or tomei 280s or big cams like that?
1NastyMR is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 20, 2011, 07:02 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
mxguy1286's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: pa
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take it for what it is, comp280s vs buschur bf272s, same boost both cams set strait up. Buschur cams in red comp280s in the blue. Buschur cams where tested when it was about 20degrees cooler in the dyno room. http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...6/oldvsnew.jpg
mxguy1286 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 29, 2011, 12:12 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
doghouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BF272 has higher lift than kelford 272?
doghouse is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 31, 2011, 05:33 PM
  #5  
Newbie
iTrader: (25)
 
Derock2gspyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: spanaway washington
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelfords any day! But yes check the gsc s3s there great cams as well
Derock2gspyder is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 31, 2011, 05:42 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
BenJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The S3's would make more power for sure, but I would go with the kelford 280's over the BF272's for the larger duration which will be helpful in the higher rpm's.
BenJ is offline  
Reply Like
Old Aug 6, 2011, 05:15 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
doghouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BF272 has higher lift than kelford 272?
doghouse is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old Oct 30, 2011, 07:49 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (85)
 
Levar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,438
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mxguy1286
Take it for what it is, comp280s vs buschur bf272s, same boost both cams set strait up. Buschur cams in red comp280s in the blue. Buschur cams where tested when it was about 20degrees cooler in the dyno room. http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...6/oldvsnew.jpg
Interesting. The BF272s are smaller and were testing with cooler temperatures only to show slower spool characteristics while having similiar topend performance. This makes me want some GSC S2s even more.
Levar is offline  
Reply Like
Tags
Back to Subforum
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
View Next Unread
Rebuild fp ball bearing turbos(not stock frame)




Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 PM.