EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain-22/)
-   -   6766 turbo ,, go with 2.1L or 2.4L (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain/580354-6766-turbo-go-2-1l-2-4l.html)

EVO(boss) Oct 22, 2011 06:37 AM

6766 turbo ,, go with 2.1L or 2.4L
 
Hi guys ,

My new setup would be 6766 turbo kit but I have 2 options on the engine

MAP stage2 2.1L 4G64 or MAP stage2 2.4L ?? the MAP 2.4L can rev to 9300rpm ....


so what do you recommend for that ??{thumbup}


saad

bbyevo8u Oct 22, 2011 06:47 AM

that a really big turbo def go with 2.0 - 2.1

REV.olution Oct 22, 2011 06:48 AM

Man this topic is all over the forums. Did you use the search feature?

Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.

In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.

That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.

EVO(boss) Oct 22, 2011 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by REV.olution (Post 9690421)
Man this topic is all over the forums. Did you use the search feature?

Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.

In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.

That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.

I will be useing this for street that all ,,,, i didn't search alot but as what i have seen the 2.1L with big turbo will be soooo fast as hell ...

DJAfterShok Oct 22, 2011 02:47 PM

Buschur 2.3RPM

S13 Curtis Oct 22, 2011 09:42 PM

2.4 or 2.3 will be just fine. You can rev the 2.4LR to 9k if need be. Mikey's is just fine and he revs to 8800.

As a matter of fact most 2liter graphs are reved to 8.5-9k anyways with a HTA86 or 6765 and you can do that with a 2.4lr so why the hell not.

EVO(boss) Oct 23, 2011 01:49 AM


Originally Posted by S13 Curtis (Post 9691593)
2.4 or 2.3 will be just fine. You can rev the 2.4LR to 9k if need be. Mikey's is just fine and he revs to 8800.

As a matter of fact most 2liter graphs are reved to 8.5-9k anyways with a HTA86 or 6765 and you can do that with a 2.4lr so why the hell not.


I have right now HKS 2.3L with 6262/.82 BB on my black evo8 did 672whp on 34psi . but i have other white stock evo so my plan is to making high whp on it ,,, I think 2.1L on 4G64 + 6766 BB kit would bo soooo crazy on the street ... I think i can make +800whp ...{thumbup}


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands