6766 turbo ,, go with 2.1L or 2.4L
6766 turbo ,, go with 2.1L or 2.4L
Hi guys ,
My new setup would be 6766 turbo kit but I have 2 options on the engine
MAP stage2 2.1L 4G64 or MAP stage2 2.4L ?? the MAP 2.4L can rev to 9300rpm ....
so what do you recommend for that ??
saad
My new setup would be 6766 turbo kit but I have 2 options on the engine
MAP stage2 2.1L 4G64 or MAP stage2 2.4L ?? the MAP 2.4L can rev to 9300rpm ....
so what do you recommend for that ??
saad
Man this topic is all over the forums. Did you use the search feature?
Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.
In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.
That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.
Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.
In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.
That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.
Man this topic is all over the forums. Did you use the search feature?
Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.
In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.
That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.
Most people are going to speak on the diversity between the two options. The 2.1 Is obviously going to be a high-rev engine and suggested for track options. The downfall is obviously going to be slower torque than the 2.4, and requiring you to rev this motor a lot higher to duplicate the same low end power of the 2.4.
In contrast, the 2.4 obviously is a low end monster, but cannot be revved as high. Resulting in a drop on the low end powerband (7.5-8.5). Not hearing of much people revving this engine to 9.3 but do at your own risk.
That is all, search next time bud. Both engines are good, but you have to pick between the two. Track = 2.1 or Street/Track = 2.4.
2.4 or 2.3 will be just fine. You can rev the 2.4LR to 9k if need be. Mikey's is just fine and he revs to 8800.
As a matter of fact most 2liter graphs are reved to 8.5-9k anyways with a HTA86 or 6765 and you can do that with a 2.4lr so why the hell not.
As a matter of fact most 2liter graphs are reved to 8.5-9k anyways with a HTA86 or 6765 and you can do that with a 2.4lr so why the hell not.
Last edited by S13 Curtis; Oct 22, 2011 at 09:45 PM.
I have right now HKS 2.3L with 6262/.82 BB on my black evo8 did 672whp on 34psi . but i have other white stock evo so my plan is to making high whp on it ,,, I think 2.1L on 4G64 + 6766 BB kit would bo soooo crazy on the street ... I think i can make +800whp ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
