I dont understand
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: North America, North East.
I dont understand
What I dont understand is Subaru allows people to post the new Impreza body style even before It came out in Aus/JP. Yet even though its roughly 30 days away from the unvailing of the Evolution 8 Debut, why doesnt Mitsubishi just post up pictures of it already?
The new subaru design was introduced at the Frankford auto show or something? I dont' remmeber and after that debute the specs and pictures were released.
As for
my soon to come car isn't really a rally car anymore. Mitsubishi basically admit that the Cedia platform sucks as a rally car and the real question is why leave it 2L?? If no active diffs anywhere the STI is the superior car on and off the road! If the mechanical diffs on the evo is true i dont' why wouldn't subaru just make the sti offical and promise a full blown setup? If that was the case i'd give up my car especially it's going to be 2nd rated from the STI. If we do get the ACD at least we could take the STI on the road and call it even and now we're probably looking at an inferior car.
As for
my soon to come car isn't really a rally car anymore. Mitsubishi basically admit that the Cedia platform sucks as a rally car and the real question is why leave it 2L?? If no active diffs anywhere the STI is the superior car on and off the road! If the mechanical diffs on the evo is true i dont' why wouldn't subaru just make the sti offical and promise a full blown setup? If that was the case i'd give up my car especially it's going to be 2nd rated from the STI. If we do get the ACD at least we could take the STI on the road and call it even and now we're probably looking at an inferior car.
Subaru debuted the new-faced Impreza at the Paris Auto Show and is being sold in other markets as we speak. So it's not to hard to figure out why we have pictures for the Impreza and not the Evo VIII. The world launch of the Evo VIII will probably be at the LA Auto Show, hence you won't see any real press photos till that time.
The Cedia platform does not suck.
entered the WRC development 2 years behind most manufacturers.
Those guys, including Subaru had time to work out the kinks over those 2 years.
Give RalliArt the respect they deserve before making statements like that.
entered the WRC development 2 years behind most manufacturers. Those guys, including Subaru had time to work out the kinks over those 2 years.
Give RalliArt the respect they deserve before making statements like that.
I'm with RaX on this one. I don't think the car can compete with the hatches at this point i.e. 206, Focus etc. I don't see why you took that to heart, but to each his own I suppose.
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
take out the driver factor before jumping to conclusion. the peugeot drivers are definitely superior than the mitsu ones, remember they are just leftovers since tommi's sudden exit. so, what do you expect?
Just sensitive, I guess.
I totally agree that the Lancer WRC was not competetive against the hot hatches. This is mainly due to the late switch on
's behalf. In addition, they may have been a little too cocky thinking they could do it quickly and be immediately competetive against the more nimble hatchbacks.
What irks me is the immediate unfounded criticism of
R&D. Agreed, the Lancer is not perfect, but the platform is very flexible and proof of excellent R&D.
makes no less than 5 different models from it.
OK, I'll go to therapy now
I totally agree that the Lancer WRC was not competetive against the hot hatches. This is mainly due to the late switch on
's behalf. In addition, they may have been a little too cocky thinking they could do it quickly and be immediately competetive against the more nimble hatchbacks.What irks me is the immediate unfounded criticism of
R&D. Agreed, the Lancer is not perfect, but the platform is very flexible and proof of excellent R&D.
makes no less than 5 different models from it.
OK, I'll go to therapy now
Trending Topics
Originally posted by sblvro
take out the driver factor before jumping to conclusion. the peugeot drivers are definitely superior than the mitsu ones, remember they are just leftovers since tommi's sudden exit. so, what do you expect?
take out the driver factor before jumping to conclusion. the peugeot drivers are definitely superior than the mitsu ones, remember they are just leftovers since tommi's sudden exit. so, what do you expect?

EDIT: How many 1st place finishes does an Evo have this year? How many second?
Last edited by HobieKopek; Dec 5, 2002 at 11:18 AM.
Originally posted by sblvro
take out the driver factor before jumping to conclusion. the peugeot drivers are definitely superior than the mitsu ones, remember they are just leftovers since tommi's sudden exit. so, what do you expect?
take out the driver factor before jumping to conclusion. the peugeot drivers are definitely superior than the mitsu ones, remember they are just leftovers since tommi's sudden exit. so, what do you expect?
Originally posted by evomk8
The Cedia platform does not suck.
entered the WRC development 2 years behind most manufacturers.
Those guys, including Subaru had time to work out the kinks over those 2 years.
Give RalliArt the respect they deserve before making statements like that.
The Cedia platform does not suck.
entered the WRC development 2 years behind most manufacturers. Those guys, including Subaru had time to work out the kinks over those 2 years.
Give RalliArt the respect they deserve before making statements like that.
Forgive me for venting. I had a Celica GT-4, then Toyota quit and went with a Corolla. Now I'm looking to buy an Evo and now Mitsu quit and are looking at a Colt. Arrgghhh.
I would have to disagree. The Cedia platform is actually pretty good. But drivers are what Mitsu needed this year. Francois may be pretty good, but when was the last time you have seen him win any WRC event? And the other good Mitsu driver was basically a rookie in comparison. If you had Tommi, Burns, Colin, and/or Gronholm, then Mitsu would have made manufacturing and drivers champion. Ex: Peugout has Burns and Gronholm, who basically won everything if they didnt crash out or have one of those Peugout hydraulic probs. Not to dis the 206 or anything, but it was mainly the amazing driving abilities of those two drivers that allowed for Peugots domination. But thats just my $0.02
Originally posted by Laxman
I would have to disagree. The Cedia platform is actually pretty good. But drivers are what Mitsu needed this year. Francois may be pretty good, but when was the last time you have seen him win any WRC event? And the other good Mitsu driver was basically a rookie in comparison. If you had Tommi, Burns, Colin, and/or Gronholm, then Mitsu would have made manufacturing and drivers champion. Ex: Peugout has Burns and Gronholm, who basically won everything if they didnt crash out or have one of those Peugout hydraulic probs. Not to dis the 206 or anything, but it was mainly the amazing driving abilities of those two drivers that allowed for Peugots domination. But thats just my $0.02
I would have to disagree. The Cedia platform is actually pretty good. But drivers are what Mitsu needed this year. Francois may be pretty good, but when was the last time you have seen him win any WRC event? And the other good Mitsu driver was basically a rookie in comparison. If you had Tommi, Burns, Colin, and/or Gronholm, then Mitsu would have made manufacturing and drivers champion. Ex: Peugout has Burns and Gronholm, who basically won everything if they didnt crash out or have one of those Peugout hydraulic probs. Not to dis the 206 or anything, but it was mainly the amazing driving abilities of those two drivers that allowed for Peugots domination. But thats just my $0.02
I agree with you that
needs to change their WRC car to stay competetive. However, I still strongly taek issue with your statement that the Cedia platform sucks.
Tommi would have stayed had
paid him the ridiculous salary he demanded. Makinen was already planning to leave in September 2001, before
was testing their WRC car.
In addition, Subaru too had some teething problems, but they had much better drivers (Burns) than
did this year to test out their car.
needs to change their WRC car to stay competetive. However, I still strongly taek issue with your statement that the Cedia platform sucks.Tommi would have stayed had
paid him the ridiculous salary he demanded. Makinen was already planning to leave in September 2001, before
was testing their WRC car.In addition, Subaru too had some teething problems, but they had much better drivers (Burns) than
did this year to test out their car.
definitely needs a new car and drivers for the WRC.BUT, the Evo VII is one hell of a rally car in Group N which is what you should be comparing the street legal Evo with. Period. The WRC cars have hardly anything in common with the road going versions other than the basic shape of the body shell. So it really isn't a big deal that Mitsu dropped out of the WRC, other than not being able to cheer for them anymore.



