Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

622 Whp on 93 octane pump gas with Alcohol injection kit !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #61  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by beavis4g63t
why don't you know were the rpm pickup is? there are only three wires going to the coil. it is the closest one to the front of the car.

what turbo did you use to achieve 600hp by 5000 rpms?

why did you only rev the car to 7000 rpms?

what is the a/f fuel ratio?

i know the rpms of the car because i went and looked at evo dyno files by rpm vs mph. an evo in third gear reaches 7400 rpms at 85 mph give or take on a dynojet. i'm not trying to flame i just want to beleive that these results are possible.
My car has a copil on plug ignition and there are no exposed coil wires - I never bothered to figure out how to hook up the coil wires as I do all the data logging and tuning with my AEM

I use a GT35R turbo

I dont want to blow up the engine on the dyno so I cut off the pulls at 7,000 - although I have reved it to 10,000 before

a/f is 11.9 / 1

60 mph = 5,000 rpms approx
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #62  
ldstang50's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Sadly we discover that the limited jets on this kit do not allow us to go much further on race gas and I decided to stop till I can work out a upgraded set up for 600 whp plus cars

There was plenty of juice up to 600 and then the alcohol was too thin

Here is C-16 with the alcohol at 36 psi

With and without the air filter
Al I see you got an idea from when you tuned my car last. Did you notice any difference in your car? I'd assume not since you are running a full stand alone
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #63  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by steveevo8
Al i think its only fair you stop teasing us with these numbers and show us a video. atleast a good 4 min video just of you driving in car video and outside shots, its ONLY fair to these wonderful evom memebers... PLEASE AL!!
Yes and I have the Rennart in car camera mount and no camera

I agree its time to do this

WHO can advise me which camera is good to buy and HOW to post it up so you guys can see it ?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #64  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Yes and I have the Rennart in car camera mount and no camera

I agree its time to do this

WHO can advise me which camera is good to buy and HOW to post it up so you guys can see it ?
The easiest "straight to the web" process would be to buy a decent digital camera that will shoot photos as well as video. Both Canon & Sony sell cameras that do this and have a standard 1/4-20 tripod mount thread that should allow you to use your Rennart mount. The Canon S410 I've got will shoot QuickTime video. All I have to do is read the file off of the compact flash card and post it to the web.

The alternative is to go with a mini-DV camcorder. After shooting the video you'll have to transfer the video to your PC and then reencode the video so you can post it.

Yet another alternative would be to buy something like the JVO Everio GZMC100. It shoots video straight to MPEG2 video and stores it on a compact flash microdrive. Very pimp little camera but you'll still have to reencode the video at a lower resolution.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #65  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
60 mph = 5,000 rpms approx
Using the first graph you posted and the number supplied above to come up with a conversion factor, I was able to come up with the following numbers reading the graph on a monitor, converting speed to RPM, and then comverting HP to torque using the torque = HP x 5252 / RPM... here are the results:

45 mph = 3750 RPM = aprox 100 HP = aprox 140 lb/ft of torque (start of graph)
48 mph = 4000 RPM = aprox 200 HP = aprox 262 lb/ft of torque
54 mph = 4500 RPM = aprox 375 HP = aprox 438 lb/ft of torque
60 mph = 5000 RPM = aprox 520 HP = aprox 546 lb/ft of torque

63 mph = 5252 RPM = aprox 600 HP = aprox 600 lb/ft of torque (torque peak)

66 mph = 5500 RPM = aprox 580 HP = aprox 553 lb/ft of torque
72 mph = 6000 RPM = aprox 605 HP = aprox 530 lb/ft of torque

78 mph = 6500 RPM = aprox 622 HP = aprox 502 lb/ft of torque (HP peak)

For comparison, my car on pump gas and stock turbo has 165hp/248 torque at 3500 RPM and 245HP/322 torque at 4000 RPM.... after that you blow me away! By 4500 RPM I have 265HP/309 torque compared to your 375HP/438 torque

Later,

Keith

Last edited by Fourdoor; Feb 10, 2005 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #66  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Good work - seems about spot on
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
Using the first graph you posted and the number supplied above to come up with a conversion factor, I was able to come up with the following numbers reading the graph on a monitor, converting speed to RPM, and then comverting HP to torque using the torque = HP x 5252 / RPM... here are the results:

45 mph = 3750 RPM = aprox 100 HP = aprox 140 lb/ft of torque (start of graph)
48 mph = 4000 RPM = aprox 200 HP = aprox 262 lb/ft of torque
54 mph = 4500 RPM = aprox 375 HP = aprox 438 lb/ft of torque
60 mph = 5000 RPM = aprox 520 HP = aprox 546 lb/ft of torque

63 mph = 5252 RPM = aprox 600 HP = aprox 600 lb/ft of torque (torque peak)

66 mph = 5500 RPM = aprox 580 HP = aprox 553 lb/ft of torque
72 mph = 6000 RPM = aprox 605 HP = aprox 530 lb/ft of torque

78 mph = 6500 RPM = aprox 622 HP = aprox 502 lb/ft of torque (HP peak)

For comparison, my car on pump gas and stock turbo has 165hp/248 torque at 3500 RPM and 245HP/322 torque at 4000 RPM.... after that you blow me away! By 4500 RPM I have 265HP/309 torque compared to your 375HP/438 torque

Later,

Keith
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 06:42 PM
  #67  
beavis4g63t's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: south colton
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
My car has a copil on plug ignition and there are no exposed coil wires - I never bothered to figure out how to hook up the coil wires as I do all the data logging and tuning with my AEM

I use a GT35R turbo

I dont want to blow up the engine on the dyno so I cut off the pulls at 7,000 - although I have reved it to 10,000 before

a/f is 11.9 / 1

60 mph = 5,000 rpms approx
you can get a rpm signal from the aem cdi box or from the cam sensor on the head.

thanks for the reply. did you say what the correction factor was?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #68  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Uncorrected
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #69  
evodave's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (546)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,876
Likes: 0
From: driving the 10 second beast in ohio or running lightmods.net
i need this ...lol
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #70  
smp3000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
lol join the club!! I wonder how much a kit would cost?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:22 AM
  #71  
Drifto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 2
From: Alabaster, AL
Great numbers Al. Just remember that Methanol will EAT rubber. If you running braided, teflon lined fuel lines, than I would only worry about o-rings and things of that nature in the fuel system. However, if your using typical rubber lined braided hose than expect to replace it often.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #72  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Drifto
Great numbers Al. Just remember that Methanol will EAT rubber. If you running braided, teflon lined fuel lines, than I would only worry about o-rings and things of that nature in the fuel system. However, if your using typical rubber lined braided hose than expect to replace it often.
The kit uses the teflon lined stainless hoses and really handles the methanol well. For most users the kit is suggested to run denatured alcohol.

I sell these kits for $499 shipped complete
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #73  
AMS97EclipseGSX's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Al out of curiosity what were the readings in SAE w/ smooth on 3? Can you get or do you have those numbers?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 02:50 PM
  #74  
Kevin90GSX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Al it always seems your car just keeps getting faster. Nice numbers bro and look forward to watching you rip it up in 05.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #75  
ModenaTwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 7
From: Moon
al i'm telling u man just put a second set of HUGE injectors and just do a complete stand alone secondary fuel system that will feed the engine straight meth past 20 psi, all you would have to do to tune for it is just tune the load sites after 20 psi, and then make some kind of a safety switch so that when the methanol fuel cell goes empty or on extremely low it wont allow the car to boost past 20 psi.

then get a bigger turbo and just put down the 8 or 900 horses on a street car that you can fuel it up with pump gas at any gas station and keep it mooving like nothing happend.

that my friend, would be a cool car.


Ed-

Last edited by ModenaTwinTurbo; Feb 11, 2005 at 03:58 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 AM.