Drove an 05 STi and 05 MR... my comparison. Long
Originally Posted by Kordwood
Depends on how you define performance. Any wing will hurt your 0 to 60 and quarter mile times because of the drag it creates. This is one reason the RS is faster than both the EVO and the MR.
I spent a long time comparing the EVO and STi, test drove each one twice, went on both internet boards to ask questions, spoke to owners at racetracks, etc. etc. I decided on the EVO and have had no second thoughts.
And yes, the STi wing and scoop did shake during a test drive when I never got over 60 mph.
How consistent and effective do you think the downforce produced by the STi wing is when it's bouncing up and down?
And what I meant was that STi owners that want a carbon fiber wing over the STi wing are ricers not people that just want a wing period.
how do you know most STi owners don't like the sound of the turbo spooling up or the low end growl from an aftermarket exhaust or the sound of a bov? I don't think you did any research or collected any facts .... Most STi owner in my area have modded their cars and love the sounds they make ..... food for thought
Last edited by nasti; Mar 1, 2005 at 09:34 AM.
the seats are about the same to me, you can hear the turbo spool also. and i dont really wana hear it spool i could careless. i chose the sti because mistsu isnt my favrite brand. and the iron block idea is just stupid on a car in 2005. i dont wana buy a car that's technoligy is from 1989. but its still a really good car and i respect evos as much as i do sti's after all we all love cars.
Originally Posted by nasti
The upper portion of the wing is not what creates the downforce on the STi. The STi wing is a dual plane the actual tilted portion is flush against the trunk which is what produces the downforce. The upper part is basically just a splitter/looks.
And what I meant was that STi owners that want a carbon fiber wing over the STi wing are ricers not people that just want a wing period.
Any your friends that put a BoV on an STi running boost under 20psi is a ricer. There is nothing wrong with exhaust, all I was talking about was the mods some STi owners do just to "hear" noises, like BoVs, which have been proven to do nothing performance wise.
And what I meant was that STi owners that want a carbon fiber wing over the STi wing are ricers not people that just want a wing period.
Any your friends that put a BoV on an STi running boost under 20psi is a ricer. There is nothing wrong with exhaust, all I was talking about was the mods some STi owners do just to "hear" noises, like BoVs, which have been proven to do nothing performance wise.
Actually from what I have read both parts of the dual plane spoiler are supposed to create downforce. It is a way to get more downforce from a smaller spoiler. The WRC Group N rules define how big a rear wing can be so then each manufacturer gets as much downforce as they need while keeping to the size restrictions. That is why Mitsubishi went to a dual plane spoiler on the Evolution VI to get more downforce the the V but make it smaller to fit the new regulations.
Aston
I agree with blueblurSTI, but with proper spelling and grammar.
They're both pretty awesome cars.
As for the other STI guy that posted on here with the "BOV's are for ricers, not real STI drivers"... I don't think I've come across many subies that DIDN'T have loud BOVs.
I don't think liking the whine of a turbo spooling makes you a ricer fanboy any more than liking the burble of a V-8 makes you an inbred redneck, or liking the growl of an Italian exotic makes you an elitist snob.
This thread started out with some really good, objective info - can we get back to that?
They're both pretty awesome cars.
As for the other STI guy that posted on here with the "BOV's are for ricers, not real STI drivers"... I don't think I've come across many subies that DIDN'T have loud BOVs.
I don't think liking the whine of a turbo spooling makes you a ricer fanboy any more than liking the burble of a V-8 makes you an inbred redneck, or liking the growl of an Italian exotic makes you an elitist snob.
This thread started out with some really good, objective info - can we get back to that?
Originally Posted by BlueBlurSTi
i chose the sti because mistsu isnt my favrite brand.
Originally Posted by BlueBlurSTi
and the iron block idea is just stupid on a car in 2005. i dont wana buy a car that's technoligy is from 1989.
Aston
The wing will not hurt your 1/4 time at all unless you are trapping at very high speeds. There is alot more drag in other places on both cars that will affect times than a thin piece of plastic... comeon now... reminds me of people in 16 second cars folding in their mirrors at the track.......
Originally Posted by troutfishin02
I agree with blueblurSTI, but with proper spelling and grammar.
They're both pretty awesome cars.
As for the other STI guy that posted on here with the "BOV's are for ricers, not real STI drivers"... I don't think I've come across many subies that DIDN'T have loud BOVs.
I don't think liking the whine of a turbo spooling makes you a ricer fanboy any more than liking the burble of a V-8 makes you an inbred redneck, or liking the growl of an Italian exotic makes you an elitist snob.
This thread started out with some really good, objective info - can we get back to that?
They're both pretty awesome cars.
As for the other STI guy that posted on here with the "BOV's are for ricers, not real STI drivers"... I don't think I've come across many subies that DIDN'T have loud BOVs.
I don't think liking the whine of a turbo spooling makes you a ricer fanboy any more than liking the burble of a V-8 makes you an inbred redneck, or liking the growl of an Italian exotic makes you an elitist snob.
This thread started out with some really good, objective info - can we get back to that?
lmao
As for the other STI guy that posted on here with the "BOV's are for ricers, not real STI drivers"... I don't think I've come across many subies that DIDN'T have loud BOVs.
Last edited by nasti; Mar 2, 2005 at 05:26 AM.


