Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

ISP Race Evo....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #46  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
That is one bad *** EVO, I can't wait to see the results!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #47  
SterlingEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
From: StVa
I'm definitely making every effort to be at MIR on July 23rd!!!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #48  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I really dont like it when people go out and do something inovatve and creative with their car (like these guys) and the arm chair quarter back haters start making negative comments - like the ones above about his roll cage or his drivetrain. This car is something to be respected and admired becuase of the great effort put forth in its creation.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #49  
Shearer's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Oh
Originally Posted by ISPracing
We fabricate alot of our own parts, that manifold for one. The exhaust at the exit of the turbo is 3inch but flares to 4inch all the way back. We are using AEM.
You guys built the manifold? Looks like Cody's work to me.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #50  
boosting101's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I really dont like it when people go out and do something inovatve and creative with their car (like these guys) and the arm chair quarter back haters start making negative comments - like the ones above about his roll cage or his drivetrain. This car is something to be respected and admired becuase of the great effort put forth in its creation.

someone has found god, its so funny doing a search on Al's old posts and his new ones, he must have been yelled at by his wife lol...or is he single??
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #51  
Kayaalp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I really dont like it when people go out and do something inovatve and creative with their car (like these guys) and the arm chair quarter back haters start making negative comments - like the ones above about his roll cage.
Safety equipment is not the place to be innovative and creative. The FIA, SCCA, NASA, BMW CCA, PCA, and every other race sanctioning body has very specific guidelines about roll-cage design, seats, and harnesses. This particular cage wouldn't pass tech with any of the organizations I mentioned above. That's a fact and "hating" has nothing to do with it. We've seen quite a few people here on evom.net who have paid lots of money on custom cages that are unsafe and no tech steward will ever let them run.

The original poster says that the cage has already passed tech with NHRA. I'm surprised, even though I know their guidelines are much less strict than those used in road racing. The angle of the harnesses over the shoulder is far to extreme to be safe in a high-speed impact. If you consider that "hating" then that's your problem.

Emre
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #52  
ISPracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: MD
Dynoflash thank you for your support. I was refering to the intake manifold, sorry for not being specific. Our cage was made by a highly credited company that specializes in roll cages. I appreciate everyones comments.

Last edited by ISPracing; Jun 13, 2005 at 07:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #53  
escoson's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Monmouth County, NJ.
holy gigantic turbo! looking good! good luck with this project!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #54  
evo542's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
11k rpm that's something unheard of...., who's the combany that balanced the engine
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #55  
ISPracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: MD
Shearer: ISP and Cody have worked together to build this amazing manifold you see. He does great work!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #56  
ISPracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: MD
evo542: Our machine shop does perfect work with our crankshaft and our custom damper helps a great deal in reaching an 11k rpm w/o issues. We are currently manufacturing these dampers, check back for updates.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #57  
EVOlunchbox's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: Pa
Awesome!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 07:53 AM
  #58  
ISPracing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: MD
Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #59  
JeffR116's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Kwman
At about what RPM will that turbo reach full spool?
Redline

What else are you guys using, other than the dampner, to rev to 11K rpm? Titanium rotating assembly?

Last edited by JeffR116; Jun 14, 2005 at 09:19 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #60  
EVOONYOASS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: char, NC
Originally Posted by ISPracing
We will soon find out. With our old set up we put down 762 whp 28 psi w/out tuning.
First off, the car looks great!!! That turbo looks GIGANTIC.

How did you reach 762 whp w/o tuning? I don't understand that part. What turbo were you using when you put down the 762 whp? Keep up the good work.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.