Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

All the hype about the MR ans IX, what the RS, that's the fastest of the 3!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #61  
ashton13's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
omg... the rs runs 0-60 in 4.3 the GSR and MR run it in 4.6... done
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #62  
AtO-MiX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,TX
Thats why i love the RS is faster than both from 0-30,0-60, 0-100 and 1/4 mile add a wing can be just as good on the track as the GSR and MR. All the evos are awesome tho which ever one you go with...hell they only reason i got my evo cause i knew the guy at the dealer and gave me a deal bought a 04 new RS 24k. With that said Nightshifter are you really vin diesel.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #63  
Noob4life's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 642
Likes: 1
From: IL, USA
Originally Posted by ashton13
omg... the rs runs 0-60 in 4.3 the GSR and MR run it in 4.6... done
At the same track, same driver, same tires, same conditions, back to back to back, best run out of 5? Then maybe I'll believe it.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:25 PM
  #64  
keevo54's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by PIC Performance
Given the choice between having ABS and not having ABS, I don't see why any knowledgeable driver would choose NOT to have ABS. That is one very possible reason why the RS will consistently put up slower laps around a track then an MR or IX with the same driver.
ABS is not the "crutch" that some people like to make it out to be. Unless you can pump the brakes faster than the electronic braking can, then you will not be stopping faster without ABS, and therefore you won't be braking later and deeper than with abs, and thefore will turn slower times.
Drivers chose to leave abs off the car for weight savings. They sometimes have a maximum weight limit and for an experienced driver it is unneccessary. When driving around a track in an abs equipped car you are instructed to brake as hard as you can without abs kicking in. So the point of ABS there is to help in unexpected situtation in which experienced drivers know how to avoid.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #65  
EvoRicer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Sac
Originally Posted by HaHAAHhAHHAH
why do people insist on calling any USDM EVO "GSR?" there is no GSR here. in japan the car they call GSR is closer to our MR than the regular EVO. in the US there is the RS, IX, and MR. or RS, VIII, and MR. there is no GSR.
We already been through this on another thread. People don't seem to listen or Comprehend English that well...USDM and JDM Vehicles are different. That's why they have some stuff we don't have here and some stuff we have that they don't have (maybe). They name their Cars what they want, we name our cars what we want. If you pull up a Vin number on a "USDM GSR"(which Someone has already), then it will pull up "GSR". Now, Insurance companies or Ourselves are not the ones that put the "GSR" in the name when we buy our Vehicles. It comes straight from Mitsu. Mitsubishi Motors are the ones that call the VIII, IXs, GSRs. So it's not something someone just made up and decided to call it the GSR...
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #66  
ashton13's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PIC Performance
At the same track, same driver, same tires, same conditions, back to back to back, best run out of 5? Then maybe I'll believe it.
or just read road and track
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #67  
Noob4life's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 642
Likes: 1
From: IL, USA
Originally Posted by keevo54
Drivers chose to leave abs off the car for weight savings. They sometimes have a maximum weight limit and for an experienced driver it is unneccessary. When driving around a track in an abs equipped car you are instructed to brake as hard as you can without abs kicking in. So the point of ABS there is to help in unexpected situtation in which experienced drivers know how to avoid.
There's plenty of other ways to cut the weight; removing something that is beneficial to performance would not be my first choice as it would be counterproductive.
Again, I have yet to meet an experienced driver that would sacrifice ABS for weight savings with the belief that it will improve the car's performance.
The point of ABS is to prevent you from locking up your tires under breaking, plain and simple. There's nothing unexpected about braking very hard, very late, very deep, as drivers use this tactic all the time to their advantage. Without ABS, this becomes more difficult to do, and is physically impossible to do to the same degree of effectiveness as you can with ABS.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #68  
Noob4life's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 642
Likes: 1
From: IL, USA
Originally Posted by ashton13
or just read road and track
I'm sorry, but I hardly consider R&T a reliable source of accurate performance evaluations....
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #69  
alloyic_rs's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: benson, nc
Originally Posted by PIC Performance
Not everyone can drive, let alone drive well enough to see performance diffs between the different Evo's.
hasnt anyone here drove both? rs and mr.
i own an rs and when i shift gears my rpms fall instantly and very quick which makes me shift very quick.
i test drove an 05 mr a few days ago and the 6 speed tranny is very smooth but when i shift the rpms float for a sec and then start to fall which allows me to shift slower than in my rs
do the regular 5 speed evos have that too? or is it just in the 6 speed mr, cuz my rs feels very very different from the MR
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:42 PM
  #70  
NightShifter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by PIC Performance
Not everyone can drive, let alone drive well enough to see performance diffs between the different Evo's.
Exactly.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #71  
NightShifter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by ashton13
omg... the rs runs 0-60 in 4.3 the GSR and MR run it in 4.6... done
That's the 05 RS. The 06 RS IX with MIVEC, Upgraded Turbo and Better Gear Ratios could probably hit 4.0 on a good day Is 3.9 possible ?

Oh, motor trend runs the cars several times and takes an average. Read the fine print. I have experience with these guys for over 10 years, and they're pretty much on the money with the same weather conditions and driver. For instance, SRT-4 0 - 60 in 5.6 is capable. Well I owned one, it took a little practice but 5.5 ~ 5.6 was the best I could do. STi 0 - 60 in 4.7. Well guess what, my STi best times, 4.57 ~ 4.8. So they're pretty accurate. They have better equipment to measure each category of performance then your standard twin axis Vector GX
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #72  
evo 8 ya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 1
From: 39.800N 76.983W
Damn this is a funny thread


Originally Posted by NightShifter
So let me get this right. The RS is really a GSR ?

Originally Posted by Thugline
It sounds like you don't know that much about the car you posses.
Originally Posted by Thugline
take off your aluminum hood, aluminum fenders, aluminum roof and add the GSR hood, fenders and roof then it is a "GSR". The "RS" is basically an "MR" without the 6-speed, Billstein suspension, BBS wheels, ABS,Power door-locks, power windows and the "Vortex Generator". Oh yeah, and the "RS" has the "Helical differental" that the"mr and the gsr" don't have.
Originally Posted by EvoRobert
Why do you have Vin Diesel as your avatar?
Originally Posted by NightShifter
why not ?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #73  
NightShifter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by AtO-MiX
Thats why i love the RS is faster than both from 0-30,0-60, 0-100 and 1/4 mile add a wing can be just as good on the track as the GSR and MR. All the evos are awesome tho which ever one you go with...hell they only reason i got my evo cause i knew the guy at the dealer and gave me a deal bought a 04 new RS 24k. With that said Nightshifter are you really vin diesel.

Well I hope my appearence in F&F III will bring back some of the people who couldn't stand 2F2F!
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #74  
WICKed'N'EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 1
From: EVO city MN
Let's see they all have the same motor....
IX RS weight less about 95 pounds lighter then the MR and 91 pounds less then the IX. So weight is the RS's advantage!! On the straight line at the 1/4 mile the RS wins both. But if racing on a longer run....like on the highway, autoX the MR have the advantage with the 6 speed gearbox!!

Get the RS if you want to keep on modify, the MR is fully loaded from mitsu so its more of a collector version. The regular IX is in the between.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #75  
AtO-MiX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,TX
Originally Posted by NightShifter
Well I hope my appearence in F&F III will bring back some of the people who couldn't stand 2F2F!
LOL yes!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.