last i heard, to get that kind of power out of the R32 is to get the turbo kit which costs like 20k right? haha

 

1st car 1980 camaro inline 6
2nd car 1985 dodge daytona turbo. Awesome fun, but blew turbo in 3 months. Hee..hee
3rd car 65 chevy impala (what a piece)
4th car 68 vw bug (fun, but no power)
5th car 1981 vw rabbit (lets all laugh together)
6th car 1997 Eclipse GST
7th car 1997 Eclipse GST (yes, I had two in a row)
8th car 2001 Lexus IS300 (very nice, no power, didnt want to do supra conversion for power)
9th car 2003 Evolution - Ladies and gentlemen......I have said enough!

 

Are you missing a zero in behind that 3? IF that is true, you're making all of us here looking like a fool. 470WHP, with $3K? With $3k we couldn't even make the Evo with 470horse at the crank.

 

since you're modding go evo.

 

I go with the Evo in a heart beat.

 

Stock to stock, the Evo (especially an IX) will smoke the R32 in ALL performance categories. The gap only widens as you start to mod. The only reason to get an R32 over an Evo is for the interior, certainly not performance. However one car that you haven't looked at is an A4 2.0T quattro. It's pretty nice when it's chipped. Obviously not in the same performance league as the Evo, but if you want a cush car that is fast ...

l8r)

 

OOooo, the new Perrin chip, 300 tq. YES PLZ!

Too bad Audi's are boring.

 

LOL . ROFL . one can only dream

 

i've heard that after heavyly modifing an sti its feels like your in a paintshaker. any truth to that?

 

To some extent, but no not really, and not always.

 

Actually STIs are really nice cars too, and they are fast too.

I wouldn't mind having a STI

 

You are on the evo forums, everyone here will say evo, delete this thread.

 

The Evo has one Modders car of the year 2 years in a row, if you're going to mod, buy an Evo.

 

Have you been in a VIII?
I wouldnt say the changes made in the IX is alot