Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 07:57 AM
  #16  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
It's all relative. It depends on how much more power you make, how well you drive, how well the new power hooks to the ground, etc.

Did you actually already run an 11.6, or were you making a guesstimate? If so, show me the timeslip, so I can make a guess on how much faster you'd go.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:01 AM
  #17  
sti killer 187's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Washington PA
Im at work timeslips are at home. My trap was 119.24. im consistant low 1.7 sixty foots( 1.71-1.73). 11.67 was the time, but I m hopeful that it could be better it was hot as ***** and humid. Dave told me that jarrod ran an 11.4 something at 120 or 121. His sixty foot was probably better. His car made I believe 341 or 342 whp on the mustang

Last edited by sti killer 187; Aug 7, 2006 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #18  
ChrisA's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
not sure what your times would go to, but i agree with getting alky
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #19  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
If you're already trapping 119.xx, then your car is in fact making good power for pump. With alky, you'll be able to push a lot more boost and potentially trap 124-125, I'd say. With 1.7 60's and the same driving, you'd be low 11s.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM.