Best intake for the stock uicp?
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
From: Ca
I didn't have any issues. The differences were noteworthy. I am running an MAPerformance EF2 turbo and it was being suffocated by the stock box. I really did see more top end and quicker spool with the Perrin.
The only down side is that its very noisy. Any time you dip into the throttle a little you can hear it spool up like a Boeing 747. Some people like that but I prefer not to drive around in car that sounds like a jet.
The only down side is that its very noisy. Any time you dip into the throttle a little you can hear it spool up like a Boeing 747. Some people like that but I prefer not to drive around in car that sounds like a jet.
Honestly I'm sure that most intakes will perform the same.... in fact in previous cars I've had a variety of them. The classic one are hard to clean, they tend to rust and sometimes they simply fall apart. The Perrin is simple to maintain and fairly inexpensive. Seems like a good choice to me.
Evolving Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 139
Likes: 4
From: Bethlehem, PA
I'm feeling too lazy/tired right now or else I'd post the link, but Chad at CBRD had a good test and tune post on here about the Perrin intake. The subject car had pretty minor bolt ons and the outcome was around 20hp or something crazy over the car's existing setup and that was WITHOUT additional tuning. Chad's a straight shooter - his writeup and results are trustworthy.
Intakes all perform the same sure....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...t-results.html
Taken from Kracka's air filter shootout, we need to sticky this thing!
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...t-results.html
Taken from Kracka's air filter shootout, we need to sticky this thing!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ETS Michael
Evo X Dyno Results
148
Feb 13, 2014 04:58 PM
ETS Michael
ExtremeTurboSystems.com – WA
17
Jan 24, 2013 09:09 PM
