Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Lower IC piping worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 12:59 PM
  #46  
Ian0611's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 5
From: IL
Originally Posted by GaBe511
I have been very undecided on a LICP, and have the same concerns as FJF. I have a stock-ish car and where a bigger pipe will net me some HP on the top end, what will i lose in response and bottom end power? Maybe very little. I use my car for DD, and response and bottom end power is more important to me since i will spend very little time in the 6k-7k rpm range.
While it makes sense (in theory) that you might lose some throttle response and spool up with a larger diameter LICP in reality I don't believe that's the case. I know I haven't been around here as long as some but I've never heard of anyone complaining about a lack of spool and throttle respose after installing an aftermarket LICP so if there is any loss from it think it's very minimal and it's doubtful you'll even notice.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 02:12 PM
  #47  
Waldo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Ian0611
While it makes sense (in theory) that you might lose some throttle response and spool up with a larger diameter LICP in reality I don't believe that's the case. I know I haven't been around here as long as some but I've never heard of anyone complaining about a lack of spool and throttle respose after installing an aftermarket LICP so if there is any loss from it think it's very minimal and it's doubtful you'll even notice.
I am in agreement here
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 06:23 PM
  #48  
shattered-4g63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Waldo
47 whp from just a filter and LICP?
Are you serious?!! That's a massive gain
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 06:27 PM
  #49  
egis's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 6
From: chicago,il
i have muse without tapering in the middle
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 06:32 PM
  #50  
egis's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 6
From: chicago,il
Originally Posted by Waldo
Where can I find the muse LICP?
here http://vr-speed.com/store/muse-motor...ing-p-346.html
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #51  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by BOOSTDBSTRD
I got the kit rom vibrant and i picked op 47HP with a good airfilter. Best bang for the buck i say.
Originally Posted by FJF
Group buy!
I'll take 2!!!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 02:56 AM
  #52  
AreSTG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
From: PA/NC
Originally Posted by GaBe511
I have been very undecided on a LICP, and have the same concerns as FJF. I have a stock-ish car and where a bigger pipe will net me some HP on the top end, what will i lose in response and bottom end power? Maybe very little. I use my car for DD, and response and bottom end power is more important to me since i will spend very little time in the 6k-7k rpm range.
i'm pretty sure the good LICP's result in better response. The total length of travel is shorter without the extra bends, and you are replacing the piece of ****, super long stock coupler with a quality short one. All that solid pipe isn't expanding like the crap stock couplers. And the last thing, which is COMPLETE speculation on my part, is that the flow is probably less interupted in the aftermarket one with less turns and changes in pipe diameter, and material.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 03:15 AM
  #53  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by AreSTG
i'm pretty sure the good LICP's result in better response. The total length of travel is shorter without the extra bends, and you are replacing the piece of ****, super long stock coupler with a quality short one. All that solid pipe isn't expanding like the crap stock couplers.
FWIW, if we calculate the difference, when the system is pressurized, the delta is relatively insignificant.

And the last thing, which is COMPLETE speculation on my part, is that the flow is probably less interupted in the aftermarket one with less turns and changes in pipe diameter, and material.
Ironically, the stock piece looks like it would cause less turbulence, as the transition between the two diameters is smoother and more gradual. Then there's the usage perspective, where the stock piece is more durable (2 mounting brackets vs none) and where the longer stock coupler proves more stress/strain relief. Not really a bad thing.

I'm not trying to pick on your comments, but to illustrate a point. We all come from varying walks of life and bring along our own life experiences. Clearly, we're not exposed to the same information and the same means of dealing with it. As such, intuitive interpretations - my own included - aren't always on point. Thankfully, there are empirical means of gauging such things.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 03:27 AM
  #54  
njboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: NJ
When it comes to intake design there are trade offs for turbo and NA engines. I would think when it comes to number of bends and intakes length, less is better. However, larger diameter pipes and even larger sized intercoolers there are trade offs from an "arm chair engineer " point of view. In the end guys like ETS, Buschur, AMS etc have many man hours and dyno's to figure out the dimensional sweet spot. My point here is that big is not always better and it's best to give the experts a call and be honest with want you really want out of your car.
Ultimately my main reason for keeping my stock LICP were the brackets so I had piece of mind that the lower pipe wouldn't pop off on the street. My second comment about response is just a theory. Call the experts.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #55  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by Waldo
Thank you everyone for your responses . They have been a lot of help to me. I'm still deciding on which one to get but I'm leaning towards the ETS or AGP!

And thank you Michael from ETS for your response!
No Problem!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #56  
djikonatx's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: austin,tx
for those that want that bracket because they are worried itll pop off , you can always have that welded on ...
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 03:36 PM
  #57  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
So, OP - which one did you go with, and was it worth it?

I have an AMS, and the mod wasn't worth it to me - but only because of the PITA it was for me to put it on myself. I even damaged my bumper cover in frustration during the process, and I can't even get the undertray back on. Oh well, it least it has never popped off on me while on the interstate.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2012 | 06:38 PM
  #58  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
^^^ Install for me was cake. I just took off the undertray. I didn't have to take off the bumper. I took pics.
  1. Take off undertray.
  2. Unbolt coolant overflow bottle
  3. Undo bolt that was under coolant overflow bottle
  4. Undo bolt through front of bumper (no pic)
  5. Undo clamps and take off
  6. Install new LICP
  7. Use hairspray (Aquanet Unscented) on couplers. Acts as a lubricant then an adhesive
  8. Boost leak test
  9. Test drive and log
  10. Adjust tune






Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #59  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Cool. I'll try that next time. If the ETS pipe is that much better I'd rather have it since I don't plan on going to crazy with mods for this car.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 08:11 AM
  #60  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Can't go wrong with the lower pipe upgrade. Expanding the first part of your intercooler piping to 2.5" is beneficial no matter which way you look at it. Throttle Response, Horsepower, etc.

Michael
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 AM.