LICP: AMS design vs ETS
LICP: AMS design vs ETS
Okay So I am getting ready to pick up my LICP. Here is my question. I see the difference between the 2 designs and I know everyone says that the ETS design is far superior. Then I read things that say the AMS design is better for drive ability because of the taper. I'm pretty sure I'm going with the ETS but I thought I would ask here for actual performance differences. Are the Dyno numbers really different or is daily driving different? Just thought I'd ask before I order today.
Thanks Guys!
Thanks Guys!
The taper is a restriction in flow. The piping diameter does not effect drive ability. A good tune and the car will drive better then stock with a lot more throttle response. You can also run the pipe w/o a tune and feel an increase in throttle response, you will just net more gains with a tune.
Thanks!
Michael
Thanks!
Michael
The ETS design is not only better imo, but its made out of SS and being mounted so low in the car, is much sturdier than an aluminum one.
The only advantage I see with the AMS design is their way routes the pipe away from that tow hook bracket piece where ones like the ETS that have a larger diameter pipe in that area can tend to have a tendency to rub on it during engine movements. The nice thing with the ETS is that it will be a piece of SS touching the metal tow hook vs. a rubber coupler like the AMS. The AMS pipe is routed to clear stuff better, but that coupler can rub on the tow hook and eventually fail. My evo came with an AMS LICP and the coupler had been rubbing long enough that it was starting to tear through.
Performance wise, some may argue that they are both close enough in performance gains that this aspect wont matter. That may or may not be true, but for the long run the ETS, or any one piece licp, is the way to go imo.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NOSintake
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
5
Jun 5, 2013 04:56 PM
Jubey97
Evo X Dyno Results
35
Feb 14, 2013 12:07 PM



