Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

help titanium exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 01:18 AM
  #16  
EvoTurboTurk's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
3" is enough
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 01:37 AM
  #17  
D1andonlyantman's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 287
Likes: 2
From: Near Cambridge, UK
Originally Posted by llDemonll
The exhaust gasses play virtually no part in turbo spool after they've been exited from the turbo
Ok, I was unsure about that part tbh, but I did read an article about maintaining gas velocity and something called the scavenger effect and having too large an exhaust is bad. If I'm wrong and an exhaust does nothing to help performance why do drag cars and NASCARs where no one gives a **** about noise even have exhausts if they are nothing but a possible restriction? I'm not trying to be argumentative and if I'm wrong I'm wrong, I just like to know what I'm talking about when it comes to this sort of stuff
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 06:38 AM
  #18  
awhit17's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 19
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by D1andonlyantman
Ok, I was unsure about that part tbh, but I did read an article about maintaining gas velocity and something called the scavenger effect and having too large an exhaust is bad. If I'm wrong and an exhaust does nothing to help performance why do drag cars and NASCARs where no one gives a **** about noise even have exhausts if they are nothing but a possible restriction? I'm not trying to be argumentative and if I'm wrong I'm wrong, I just like to know what I'm talking about when it comes to this sort of stuff
A lot of it depends upon the engine in question. Like for example on a K series Honda essentially all necessary scavenging is done in the header, about every K series will make the most power open header. A B series Honda typically will lose power with anything larger with a 2.5" exhaust. I'm not as familiar with how the 4G63 does but clearly people are saying there is no benefit moving past a 3" at modest power levels.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 06:49 AM
  #19  
wingless's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 6
From: Boston
You need a 5"exhaust and it has to be machined out of a single giant billet piece of beryllium for the maximum thermally efficiency powers. Anything less is not even trying.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 07:09 AM
  #20  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by wingless
You need a 5"exhaust and it has to be machined out of a single giant billet piece of beryllium for the maximum thermally efficiency powers. Anything less is not even trying.
I was just gonna tell him to settle for a regular Titanium 5". But Beryllium sounds tasty.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 07:16 AM
  #21  
llDemonll's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 99
From: Washington
Originally Posted by D1andonlyantman
Ok, I was unsure about that part tbh, but I did read an article about maintaining gas velocity and something called the scavenger effect and having too large an exhaust is bad. If I'm wrong and an exhaust does nothing to help performance why do drag cars and NASCARs where no one gives a **** about noise even have exhausts if they are nothing but a possible restriction? I'm not trying to be argumentative and if I'm wrong I'm wrong, I just like to know what I'm talking about when it comes to this sort of stuff
I was speaking more for turbo cars. I believe on NA cars that some backpressure is better than no backpressure

NASCAR and F1 and such like that is probably a bad example to compare to as they are likely using the exhaust to route air around the car most efficiently and aerodynamically
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 08:54 PM
  #22  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by llDemonll
The exhaust gasses play virtually no part in turbo spool after they've been exited from the turbo

Negative ghost rider. I'm grossly oversimplifying this but if the gas that has already passed the turbo are unable to exit the system quickly enough they end up meeting the next round of gas particles and so on. In an extreme case this ends up killing the velocity of the gases by the turbo and thus its ability to spool. That's why ideally you want the exhaust as large as possible so that you don't ever run into this problem. So the velocity of those gases is important up to a certain point.

To the OP, as others have pointed out is that past 3" unless you are running something ridiculous it won't make much of a difference so if you want to do it to say you did then fine.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 10:17 PM
  #23  
AreSTG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
From: PA/NC
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
you guys ever get a weight of your stainless exhausts? I called to order the 3.5" titanium probably a year ago, I guess, but couldn't justify the cost without knowing the difference in weight from my ETS 3.5" stainless exhaust.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 11:44 PM
  #24  
kpt6's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 684
Likes: 77
From: U.S.A.
How does everyone here who has said 3" is enough know for certain that 3" is in fact enough? Are you all just saying it because someone else said it at some point in time?

Although this isn't an Evo, it may be worth reading:
http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...ust-test-tech/

Originally Posted by llDemonll
The exhaust gasses play virtually no part in turbo spool after they've been exited from the turbo
I'm apt disagree with that, but I don't claim to be an expert on the subject. What codgi said sounds pretty right-on though, based on the little I have learned. Too bad Full-Race Geoff is banned from here, otherwise I bet he'd happily post docs, diagrams, and other related info from his engineering books to prove what is true on the topic either way. Maybe someone should email him for an answer...
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 03:02 AM
  #25  
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: :noitacoL
What about all those setups you see the exhaust comes out of the front bumper/front fender area?
It just dumps a couple feet out of the hot side. No time to build up all those gas velocities that everyone speaks of.
My 2 cents of layman logic :-)
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 05:17 AM
  #26  
NSDQ's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville, TN
Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR
What about all those setups you see the exhaust comes out of the front bumper/front fender area?
It just dumps a couple feet out of the hot side. No time to build up all those gas velocities that everyone speaks of.
My 2 cents of layman logic :-)
My buddy here in town ran a 10.1 in his Evo 8 with the exhaust running out of the passenger side front bumper. Said only change that needed to be made was driver mod.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 07:20 AM
  #27  
llDemonll's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 99
From: Washington
Originally Posted by codgi
Negative ghost rider. I'm grossly oversimplifying this but if the gas that has already passed the turbo are unable to exit the system quickly enough they end up meeting the next round of gas particles and so on. In an extreme case this ends up killing the velocity of the gases by the turbo and thus its ability to spool. That's why ideally you want the exhaust as large as possible so that you don't ever run into this problem. So the velocity of those gases is important up to a certain point.

To the OP, as others have pointed out is that past 3" unless you are running something ridiculous it won't make much of a difference so if you want to do it to say you did then fine.
True, but what I meant was in terms of backpressure or the gasses somehow helping the turbo spool faster after they're passed through the turbo, of which neither play a part
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2014 | 08:36 PM
  #28  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by kpt6
How does everyone here who has said 3" is enough know for certain that 3" is in fact enough? Are you all just saying it because someone else said it at some point in time?
Because you can calculate at what point that 3" is going to be a restriction and years ago this calculation was done on this forum and testing was done and confirmed by several shops at the time. The 3" has worked on successful rally competition cars, track, HPDE and TA cars and even drag cars that went into the high 8s. If it can do all of that without imploding the car it seems to have proven the point. Now with this new crazy 1/2mile and mile stuff going on where folks want to chase GT-Rs, Lambos etc. then you'd need to do the maths again and see. But if the OP is that serious about that kind of stuff it seems best to get hooked up with a legit shop who can answer the question.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 05:41 AM
  #29  
enjoiskater7788's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
From: Harrisburg
The OP question wasn't is 3 inch enough... he wanted to know where to buy 4 inch aluminum v band and muffler.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 04:38 PM
  #30  
EvoTurboTurk's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
What we are saying is 3" is good enough size for weight, power, etc. Its been proven, I'm not saying it because others are mentioning it. There is no need to going bigger.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 PM.