Is a stock Evo more car than most can handle?
Originally Posted by moviemadness
Is there a track near western NY? haha.. or even in the toronto area?
Supposedly an educated/ experienced driver can outrun an uneducated/ inexperienced driver with the better car.
Last edited by propellerhead; May 3, 2004 at 02:03 PM.
Originally Posted by Coolguy949
I encourage everyone to at least track their Evo once (not drag! but ROAD RACING), you'll really learn to appreciate your car and you'll feel much more knowledable in general of how to drive. I dont even drive fast on the streets anymore. I feel like I'm too good of a driver to race around on the streets now and I'm constantly thinking about the next track day and what brake pads to get this time so I can get more late braking. Now I see how those Porsche Owners Club guys can still drive around in 20 year old porsches on the track and still be as excited as the first day they bought it. Tracking your car really adds a new dimension to owning it, and it's hard to make the excitment go away.
A stock Evo isn't really that fast.... 98-102 is average for a sports car... Now when you star modding the fun begins and it is a totally different ballgame...
Last edited by machron1; Jun 7, 2004 at 07:19 PM.
I laugh when people take their Evo's to a drag strip, click off an 11 or 12 second pass and call it a "sport". Granted, there is some skill involved, but nowhere near what it takes to keep the concentration going for even a little half hour hot lapping session. All you have to worry about when you're drag racing is blowing your car up and/or hitting the wall. When you're at a real track, you have to worry about blowing your car up, hitting the wall, ending up in the grass, is this guy in the Vette behind me going to pass me on the outside or the inside?, should I try to trailbrake on this one?, how late should I brake for this turn?, Oh, that's what brake fade is...OH, ****!
Hell, even when I'm on the track, I don't go 10/10ths.
My favorite part of a track event is driving home.
Hell, even when I'm on the track, I don't go 10/10ths.
My favorite part of a track event is driving home.
Originally Posted by machron1
<snip> If you think you can lose the tail at speed in a turn and recover easily, you are wrong. </snip>
But to your point, the Evo requires much more focus and attention to driving than other cars. Also, I think because the car is so easy to drive at 7/10s, it makes noobs feel comfortable pushing the envelope. The problem is that they don't have the skills to be operating above 7/10s and get into trouble.
The Evo is very friendly beyond its limits, not like a z06 which can be a monster if you goof. Setting the tire pressures high in the rears will allow you to explore the tail happiness of the Evo. It shocked me how easily i could hold a slide in it.
Last edited by OKevo8; May 24, 2004 at 07:52 AM.
Originally Posted by 4G63>OOOO
I laugh when people take their Evo's to a drag strip, click off an 11 or 12 second pass and call it a "sport". Granted, there is some skill involved, but nowhere near what it takes to keep the concentration going for even a little half hour hot lapping session. All you have to worry about when you're drag racing is blowing your car up and/or hitting the wall. When you're at a real track, you have to worry about blowing your car up, hitting the wall, ending up in the grass, is this guy in the Vette behind me going to pass me on the outside or the inside?, should I try to trailbrake on this one?, how late should I brake for this turn?, Oh, that's what brake fade is...OH, ****!
Hell, even when I'm on the track, I don't go 10/10ths.
My favorite part of a track event is driving home.
Hell, even when I'm on the track, I don't go 10/10ths.
My favorite part of a track event is driving home.

i think it takes skill for both events.. some enjoy drag racing, some enjoy track racing, some enjoy drifting, and rallying... different strokes for different folks...
you could say drifting are failed autox'ers , and autox'ers are poor because they can't afford to track race, and the majority of track racers are just rich pocketmodders that can't tune their cars if their lives depended on it and that draggers cant do anything but drive straight... that's not a good way to look at things... might as well say nascar doesnt take skill because you only turn one way
Originally Posted by mr96gsx408
wow, then you gotta be a expert at drag racing then
i think it takes skill for both events.. some enjoy drag racing, some enjoy track racing, some enjoy drifting, and rallying... different strokes for different folks...
you could say drifting are failed autox'ers , and autox'ers are poor because they can't afford to track race, and the majority of track racers are just rich pocketmodders that can't tune their cars if their lives depended on it and that draggers cant do anything but drive straight... that's not a good way to look at things... might as well say nascar doesnt take skill because you only turn one way
i think it takes skill for both events.. some enjoy drag racing, some enjoy track racing, some enjoy drifting, and rallying... different strokes for different folks...
you could say drifting are failed autox'ers , and autox'ers are poor because they can't afford to track race, and the majority of track racers are just rich pocketmodders that can't tune their cars if their lives depended on it and that draggers cant do anything but drive straight... that's not a good way to look at things... might as well say nascar doesnt take skill because you only turn one way

About your other analogies, most of them don't make sense. Drifting requires intense concentration, Auto-X calls for great car control (considering the car is constantly changing direction) and track racing is...well, expensive compared to auto-x and drag racing, but it's what I like. You can't really drive fast on the street after you've been to a track day. There isn't really much of a point, if you ask me. (But no one did)
The guys who bag on drag racing are correct that it is mindlessly easy to simply go down the dragstrip. However, they are wrong when talking about competitive (money) drag racing. Because in a class where horsepower wins races, science and perfection play HUGE roles. In a class where horsepower is not necessarily what wins races (bracket racing) driver skill, strategy, and EXTREME repeatability come into play. And that race is much less forgiving than a 30 minute road race that gives plenty of time to correct for errors. 10 or 11 seconds (average) is not much time to be less than perfect. I love road racing but I depend on drag racing (NHRA/IHRA) for almost a third of my yearly income. While I have fun going around corners, I take the straight line seriously.
Originally Posted by 4G63>OOOO
About your other analogies, most of them don't make sense.


)drifting = using the slowest technique possible in taking a turn (on tarmac)
autox = racing around orange cones around a k-mart parking lot
track = all you see are vettes, porches, ect. owned by rich bastards
drag = only goes straight by stepping on the gas and shifting right?
Originally Posted by mr96gsx408
autox = racing around orange cones around a k-mart parking lot
In all fairness, each modality of racing takes a skill set all its own. Do some cross over to other, of course. AutoXers generally can make the move to road racing and do well after a short period to adjust for the slower pace of things (Not race pace, but that the maneuvers are not so tightly linked.
There is a skill in going fast on a road course, and a lot of the AutoX tools can be used there. The converse is not necessarily true. A great road racer does not always make a great AutoXer. a lot of the higher level skills used in road racing can not be directly applied to an autox track where you rarely get out of 2nd gear. The pace is more frenetic, and any small mistake will cost you it all. In track racing unless that mistake is in the last couple of laps, you have time to try to make it up.
Drifting is a whole other planet from either of those, and drag racing, while it does not involve any turns, has a specific set of skills as well.
I think of all of these, the EVO is easily the most suited to the first 2. The EVO was never envisioned as a drag car, so to say that the 13.x et 10x.xmph capabilities of a stock EVO are average does not mean near as much as saying in equally skilled hands it will lap willow springs at the same pace as most Corvettes, Porsches, and Vipers (Stock for stock). Plus it can actually carry 4 people.
To each his own I say, but do not disparage me because I have yet to do a power mod on the car, but have spent plenty on suspension that a lot of people say is pretty much right there out of the box. Sure, my car still only runs 13.x on the drag strip. To all you drag guys who think that sucks, Lets go for one drag race, and one average autocross run, and add together the time. Chances are I will beat you silly 9 times out of 10.
Back to the initial question now.
Is the EVO more car than most people can handle, I do not think so. I think that most of the average owners will never push the EVO to a fraction of what they are capable of. So I would agree that the average driver may get himself into trouble, but I am not thinking it is due to the car being too much. Generally those situations are a matter of the driver being too little.
^^all very true. i autox'ed a type R for one year and an S2000 for two. if you've never tried it, you'd be AMAZED at how much skill is required to compete with the best drivers in any region, let alone at nationals.
question though: it doesn't seem that the evo would be competitive especially in A-stock. no low end torque, hard to launch without blowing the tranny, etc. also, how do you negotiate the hairpins with such a large turning radius?
question though: it doesn't seem that the evo would be competitive especially in A-stock. no low end torque, hard to launch without blowing the tranny, etc. also, how do you negotiate the hairpins with such a large turning radius?


