ugliest EVO ever thread
how are some of those cars any less ricey than these?.. 8 zillion stickers, bad paint jobs and transformer parts.. right?

darth vaders retarded cousin

painters stand on that to work on buildings

its voltrons left foot.

looks like it has side burns.

looks like a place mat from a chinese restaraunt

rolin on pumpkins.. (hehe.. sorry.. had to)
rice is a pretty selectively subjective thing.
for example.. if i put a big sticker that says "caution excessive boost" on my car.. its it ricey?

darth vaders retarded cousin

painters stand on that to work on buildings

its voltrons left foot.

looks like it has side burns.

looks like a place mat from a chinese restaraunt

rolin on pumpkins.. (hehe.. sorry.. had to)
rice is a pretty selectively subjective thing.
for example.. if i put a big sticker that says "caution excessive boost" on my car.. its it ricey?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
From: vegas baby....
oh come on... you know rollin on pumkins is hott with 2 t's .... 
and we always called the AMS wing a big cheese slicer.. but I like the painters stand comparo.. ha ha

and we always called the AMS wing a big cheese slicer.. but I like the painters stand comparo.. ha ha
you must be retarded to think that those time attack cars are ugly or ricey. They are functional additions that make them faster. Not needless ricer parts. And saying the GSC time attack car is ricey is a bold ignorant move.
how functional are those stickers, chrome parts and custom paint jobs?.. dont most carbon fiber evo hoods weight more than stock?
and ive seen alot of things that are function and ugly at the same time..


but im a retard so what do i know.
and its not GSCs time attack car.. it actually belongs to a person.
Last edited by ryan0; Feb 28, 2007 at 11:18 AM.
I totally agree. Ugly might be ugly, but ugly is not necessarily ricey. There is a line between the two. And those time attack cars are beautiful IMHO. I would agree it would be wierd to drive them everyday, but they are track cars afterall.
yes.. im retarded..
how functional are those stickers, chrome parts and custom paint jobs?.. dont most carbon fiber evo hoods weight more than stock?
and ive seen alot of things that are function and ugly at the same time..

but im a retard so what do i know.
and its not GSCs time attack car.. it actually belongs to a person.
how functional are those stickers, chrome parts and custom paint jobs?.. dont most carbon fiber evo hoods weight more than stock?
and ive seen alot of things that are function and ugly at the same time..

but im a retard so what do i know.
and its not GSCs time attack car.. it actually belongs to a person.
Yes I know. Nils car is very nice and I didnt intend to say it was owned by GSC. As far as chrome you need to stop smoking crack. There is no chrome anywhere on those cars. They are purposely built for the track and that alone makes them amazing. Also, you calling the superbird and ugly car is just bad taste.
Actually I think the Superbird is ugly as crap. Would I take one...hells yes. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It is one thing saying something is ugly....but bashing the owner is another thing. Everyone has a reason, whether it be money, looks, or just to be original...it is their right.
oh sorry.. "highly polished, buffed out aluminum.".. oh.. and a pop up windshield.. missed that.. thats like 50hp

and the super bird was ugly... functional piece of history.. but ugly.. so stay away from my crack.
Last edited by ryan0; Feb 28, 2007 at 11:19 AM.
RyanO, you are funny. I love every single car you posted and would love to own any of them. And while you may not like the graphics or polished parts on the Weld S14, that thing is an amazing example of functional metal fabrication.







where did you dig this one up? yuk!