Ride height: Positive Rake vs. Negative Rake
It's too late to tackle that here (its 10pm in Chicago). But I can tell you this: I will take the concept of a roll center over that FAP concept any day of the week and twice on Sundays. Why? I don't feel like calculating tire loads, and the RC gives me an approximate but IMO accurate enough idea of how the front will behave under specific circumstances. Maybe it's not accurate enough to get precise jacking forces, but when you're at the level where you're calculating tire loads, you most likely have a nice suspension simulator that you can simply plug numbers into and get numbers out.
Or... maybe I am missing something very important. In fact, I know I am. That thing is sleep.
Or... maybe I am missing something very important. In fact, I know I am. That thing is sleep.
If your front lower control arms point up and out from the center of the car then its too low. Shouldn't be lowered any more than parallel to the ground. At least that is a rule of thumb.
So what if I get SWIFT MR SPEC R springs for my Stock Bilsteins? Would I have to increase the front track (use spacers 10mm KICS spacers for the stock BBS rims) as well as increase the negative camber (-2.5 on stock camber bolts with another -2 deg from camber plates) to get less understeer during inital turn-in?
And with the roll center correction kit? What happens then (assuming we're still talking about a car where the lower arms are parallel or slightly pointed upwards from the center).
So what if I get SWIFT MR SPEC R springs for my Stock Bilsteins? Would I have to increase the front track (use spacers 10mm KICS spacers for the stock BBS rims) as well as increase the negative camber (-2.5 on stock camber bolts with another -2 deg from camber plates) to get less understeer during inital turn-in?
I'm not sure what kind of racing you do but if you stick with the swifts then adding a rear sway bar will help reduce understeer and help keep the car flatter. Many people will argue about the RSB but even Whiteline will tell you its a performance enhancing mod.
The RCC kit will help but if you've lowered the car to the point of inverted LCAs then you are lower than optimal for BEST handling. This doesn't mean the car will handle like crap. Up until last year next to no EVOs were using RCC kits and they still had performed wonderfully.
So what if I get SWIFT MR SPEC R springs for my Stock Bilsteins? Would I have to increase the front track (use spacers 10mm KICS spacers for the stock BBS rims) as well as increase the negative camber (-2.5 on stock camber bolts with another -2 deg from camber plates) to get less understeer during inital turn-in?
An adjustable rear sway bar would help as well.
- Andrew
I was thinking about setting my camber to -1 deg from the bolts and setting the camber plates to -1.5 to get -2.5 deg of camber in total. For some reason I can't get more than -1.7 deg of camber on my right front bilsten, I suspect it might have been bent slighty by a recent encounter with a really large pothole (obviously I couldn't avoid it).
Before I was able to get -2.5 deg of camber up front with stock camber bolts alone. I just hope it's ok for me to run springs, camber plates and a rear sway bar. I checked and re-checked and counldn't find anything wrong with the components on the right front side. I was really hoping to bring my car out to AutoX this spring but I guess minor setbacks like this won't allow me to do so, so i've just been driving my car on the street.
Before I was able to get -2.5 deg of camber up front with stock camber bolts alone. I just hope it's ok for me to run springs, camber plates and a rear sway bar. I checked and re-checked and counldn't find anything wrong with the components on the right front side. I was really hoping to bring my car out to AutoX this spring but I guess minor setbacks like this won't allow me to do so, so i've just been driving my car on the street.
Last edited by timmiii; Jan 8, 2008 at 09:54 PM.
I just had a thought, if I do get springs (swift MR spec R's) and camber plates (Cusco) then the springs give a 1.4" drop in front and the camber plates are 0.5" thick, then I'll only see a 0.9" drop in front. In the rear the springs drop it 0.8", so wouldn't I still end up with a negative rake. Wouldn't that be a bad thing?
I wouldn't worry about rake as much as alignment. An aggressive alignment and sticky tires will make any evo handle great. Most people do springs as an appearance mod. The truth is the stock suspension is very good and adding springs doesn't always make it better. Even coil overs need to be dialed in.


