TIEN H Techs= REALLY ****TY HANDLING!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Originally posted by ogvw
When you lower your car it changes the toe setting DRAMATICALLY! Toe setting has a tremendous affect on steering feel - get a good aligment, set the toe to zero or 1/16" total toe out (front, run zero toe in the back) and you will be amazed at the difference.
Good luck!
When you lower your car it changes the toe setting DRAMATICALLY! Toe setting has a tremendous affect on steering feel - get a good aligment, set the toe to zero or 1/16" total toe out (front, run zero toe in the back) and you will be amazed at the difference.
Good luck!
nope....I meant what I said. A little toe out (1/16" TOTAL) is good - helps high speed stability, and helps to "self straighten" the wheel when unwinding steering lock in a corner. I have been racing and prepping cars for quite a while (14 years of working on IMSA, Speedvision, Vintage, Sportscar and street cars). Toe in makes the car feel darty, with a strange transition from straight to turn. Remmber I am only talking about 1/16" total (1/32" each side) very close to zero toe........
Well I don't agree with you so we might as well leave it at that.
Toe out is bad for tires. On a race car it's fine because you don't expect them to last but on a common street car it is detrimental.
Also I am talking about a minimal amount of toe in or 0 toe. Ultimately 0 toe going down the road will create some toe out, but I don't agree with starting with toe-out statically.
I am talking about the street car point of view, which a majority of people are looking at. After aligning my car after installing springs I ended up with 1.5 or so negative camber and am buying camber plates to take some of that out. At the end of the day I don't want to be unneccessarily replacing tires for wear for the given advantage of extra camber.
Toe out is bad for tires. On a race car it's fine because you don't expect them to last but on a common street car it is detrimental.
Also I am talking about a minimal amount of toe in or 0 toe. Ultimately 0 toe going down the road will create some toe out, but I don't agree with starting with toe-out statically.
I am talking about the street car point of view, which a majority of people are looking at. After aligning my car after installing springs I ended up with 1.5 or so negative camber and am buying camber plates to take some of that out. At the end of the day I don't want to be unneccessarily replacing tires for wear for the given advantage of extra camber.
Originally posted by timzcat
Well I don't agree with you so we might as well leave it at that.
Toe out is bad for tires. On a race car it's fine because you don't expect them to last but on a common street car it is detrimental.
Also I am talking about a minimal amount of toe in or 0 toe. Ultimately 0 toe going down the road will create some toe out, but I don't agree with starting with toe-out statically.
I am talking about the street car point of view, which a majority of people are looking at. After aligning my car after installing springs I ended up with 1.5 or so negative camber and am buying camber plates to take some of that out. At the end of the day I don't want to be unneccessarily replacing tires for wear for the given advantage of extra camber.
Well I don't agree with you so we might as well leave it at that.
Toe out is bad for tires. On a race car it's fine because you don't expect them to last but on a common street car it is detrimental.
Also I am talking about a minimal amount of toe in or 0 toe. Ultimately 0 toe going down the road will create some toe out, but I don't agree with starting with toe-out statically.
I am talking about the street car point of view, which a majority of people are looking at. After aligning my car after installing springs I ended up with 1.5 or so negative camber and am buying camber plates to take some of that out. At the end of the day I don't want to be unneccessarily replacing tires for wear for the given advantage of extra camber.
No. Given the horrible factory settings, the springs made that even worse so I pretty much aligned it right away. After the springs there was close to an inch of toe out.
.77 of it was on one side alone.
I don't drive the car every day. I do a lot of city type driving to and from work so I usually take the beater (automatic) unless the weather is nice then I will take the Evo. For a large corporate building, none of them know how to open a car door without hitting the car next to them.
My old car was horrible from parking there so when I drive the Evo I park way out to avoid the idiots.
.77 of it was on one side alone.I don't drive the car every day. I do a lot of city type driving to and from work so I usually take the beater (automatic) unless the weather is nice then I will take the Evo. For a large corporate building, none of them know how to open a car door without hitting the car next to them.
My old car was horrible from parking there so when I drive the Evo I park way out to avoid the idiots.
The problem with the car that started the post definitely seemsto be alignment related. I would also bet that when you get the car aligned properly you will again feel the happiness.
As far as the "toe-in, toe-out" issue....I would bet that the car is in a bunch. imagine both wheels toed in towards the centerline of the vehicle, you go to make a left turn, you will have to turn the wheel that much further (more input) to overcome the "toe-in" to make the same radius taht you would with a wheel that is "toed out" slightly. In a perfect world, yes, zero toe would be best with regards to rolling friction, tire wear etc. (I have seen cars at PIR (Portland) running too much toe-out and the cvar is slow in the traps at the end of the front straight....it does make a difference. However, for the most part, like OGVW stated, a slight ammount of toe-out is quite useful on many road courses, as well as spirited driving. It helps the car to turn in!!! Period, this is where you see and feel it most, on "turn-in". If you go too far on the toe setting, the car will turn too much and will have a tendancy to "oversteer"......balance Daniel-San.
Oviously, suspension tuning has many variables, eliminating them one at a time is the best way to go.
BTW.... toe-out increases twitchyness at high speed. Less toe-out at fast tracks, more at tight ones.
-peace
As far as the "toe-in, toe-out" issue....I would bet that the car is in a bunch. imagine both wheels toed in towards the centerline of the vehicle, you go to make a left turn, you will have to turn the wheel that much further (more input) to overcome the "toe-in" to make the same radius taht you would with a wheel that is "toed out" slightly. In a perfect world, yes, zero toe would be best with regards to rolling friction, tire wear etc. (I have seen cars at PIR (Portland) running too much toe-out and the cvar is slow in the traps at the end of the front straight....it does make a difference. However, for the most part, like OGVW stated, a slight ammount of toe-out is quite useful on many road courses, as well as spirited driving. It helps the car to turn in!!! Period, this is where you see and feel it most, on "turn-in". If you go too far on the toe setting, the car will turn too much and will have a tendancy to "oversteer"......balance Daniel-San.
Oviously, suspension tuning has many variables, eliminating them one at a time is the best way to go.
BTW.... toe-out increases twitchyness at high speed. Less toe-out at fast tracks, more at tight ones.
-peace
On my car, I have the front end in toe out. Toe out quickens the steering, therefore it makes the car feel more 'twitchy'. You only need a little, the 1/16th inch recommended earlier is good. You have to remember, when you get on the brakes, the car toes out naturally, so if you have too much, you'll wear the inside of the tires fast.
If you're looking for more straight line stability, have them set the front to toe in. The steering is already quick to begin with, and this setting should help for those using the cars as daily drivers by allowing the car to be more stable at speed.
If you're looking for more straight line stability, have them set the front to toe in. The steering is already quick to begin with, and this setting should help for those using the cars as daily drivers by allowing the car to be more stable at speed.
I am so confused, what the hell do I set my car to? I have these settings...
LF: RF:
Camber:
-1.45* -1.50*
Toe:
0.00* 0.00*
Caster:
+3.38* +3.41*
LR: RR:
Camber:
-.59* -.61*
Toe:
+.15* +.14*
and then I get these....
WTF do I do?????????????????
LF: RF:
Camber:
-1.45* -1.50*
Toe:
0.00* 0.00*
Caster:
+3.38* +3.41*
LR: RR:
Camber:
-.59* -.61*
Toe:
+.15* +.14*
and then I get these....
According to the online service manual (before it became a pay-subscription service), there are two selections for front camber: -1.00 deg and -2.00 deg (plus or minus 0.5 deg).
FRONT
ITEM SPECIFICATION
Toe-in mm (in.) 0 ± 2 (0 ± 0.08)
Steering angle Inner wheel 31°45’ ± 1°30’
Outer wheel (reference) 27°15’
Camber (selectable from 2 options) -1°00’ ± 30’ or -2°00’ ± 30’ (Left/right deviation within 30’)
Caster 3°55’ ± 30’ (Left/right deviation within 30’)
Kingpin inclination 13°45’ ± 1°30’
Lower arm ball joint breakaway torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 3.4 (4.4 - 30.1)
Lower arm pillow ball bushing rotation starting torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5-3.0 (4.4-26.6)
Stabilizer link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 1.7 - 3.2 (15 - 28)
REAR
ITEM STANDARD VALUE
Toe-in mm (in) 3 ± 2 (0.12 ± 0.07)
Camber -1°00’ ± 30’ (Difference between right and left within 30’)
Thrust angle 0°00’ ± 0°09’
Upper arm ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Trailing arm ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Assist link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Assist link slide bushing turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.0 (4.4 - 17)
Lower arm pillow ball bushing turning N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 3.0 (4.4 - 26)
Stabilizer bar link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 1.7 - 3.1 (15 - 2
Desired Front Camber -1.0 degree.
Front and Rear toe 0 degree.
Desired Rear Camber -1.0 degree.
These will give you stocklike but better handling. Get a rear swaybar and endlinks and rear strut bar. Car will handle great.
Bluesmaster
FRONT
ITEM SPECIFICATION
Toe-in mm (in.) 0 ± 2 (0 ± 0.08)
Steering angle Inner wheel 31°45’ ± 1°30’
Outer wheel (reference) 27°15’
Camber (selectable from 2 options) -1°00’ ± 30’ or -2°00’ ± 30’ (Left/right deviation within 30’)
Caster 3°55’ ± 30’ (Left/right deviation within 30’)
Kingpin inclination 13°45’ ± 1°30’
Lower arm ball joint breakaway torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 3.4 (4.4 - 30.1)
Lower arm pillow ball bushing rotation starting torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5-3.0 (4.4-26.6)
Stabilizer link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 1.7 - 3.2 (15 - 28)
REAR
ITEM STANDARD VALUE
Toe-in mm (in) 3 ± 2 (0.12 ± 0.07)
Camber -1°00’ ± 30’ (Difference between right and left within 30’)
Thrust angle 0°00’ ± 0°09’
Upper arm ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Trailing arm ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Assist link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.5 (4.4 - 22)
Assist link slide bushing turning torque N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 2.0 (4.4 - 17)
Lower arm pillow ball bushing turning N·m (in-lb) 0.5 - 3.0 (4.4 - 26)
Stabilizer bar link ball joint turning torque N·m (in-lb) 1.7 - 3.1 (15 - 2
Desired Front Camber -1.0 degree.
Front and Rear toe 0 degree.
Desired Rear Camber -1.0 degree.
These will give you stocklike but better handling. Get a rear swaybar and endlinks and rear strut bar. Car will handle great.
Bluesmaster
WTF do I do?????????????????
Last edited by umiami80; Mar 30, 2004 at 09:02 AM.
Originally posted by ogvw
We can certianly agree that toe out (or in for that matter) wears out your tires quickly - so yes, zero toe is best for tire wear. Did your car wear out the tires quickly with zero toe and 1.5 degrees of camber?? Usually camber doesnt play as huge a role in tire wear - toe is much more destructive.
We can certianly agree that toe out (or in for that matter) wears out your tires quickly - so yes, zero toe is best for tire wear. Did your car wear out the tires quickly with zero toe and 1.5 degrees of camber?? Usually camber doesnt play as huge a role in tire wear - toe is much more destructive.
what he said is
Originally posted by umiami80
I am so confused, what the hell do I set my car to? I have these settings...
LF: RF:
Camber:
-1.45* -1.50*
Toe:
0.00* 0.00*
Caster:
+3.38* +3.41*
LR: RR:
Camber:
-.59* -.61*
Toe:
+.15* +.14*
and then I get these....
WTF do I do?????????????????
I am so confused, what the hell do I set my car to? I have these settings...
LF: RF:
Camber:
-1.45* -1.50*
Toe:
0.00* 0.00*
Caster:
+3.38* +3.41*
LR: RR:
Camber:
-.59* -.61*
Toe:
+.15* +.14*
and then I get these....
WTF do I do?????????????????
I think your current setting is fine.....if you want a even better handling...set the rear toe to 0.
I have -1.8 front camber on L&R
-0.7 rear camber......and all toe is 0. Car handle great in autox, and should also have good tire wear.
Originally posted by umiami80
I am so confused, what the hell do I set my car to?
I am so confused, what the hell do I set my car to?
I did not get an alignement afterwards but how much better could an alignment be? I want BETTER THEN STOCK HANDLING on my ride, right now it is WAY WORSE< WTF MATE!?!?!?!?!?!


