Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2011 Evo X GSR Bolt Ons Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 02:20 AM
  #1  
MichaelUWright's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: CA
2011 Evo X GSR Bolt Ons Tune

2011 Evo X GSR
Turboback exhaust
-MAP Downpipe
-Speedcircut Testpipe
-CNT RS Exhaust
Custom Intake
ETS 4.0" Intercooler
AGP Hardpipe kit
GM 3 port

Tuned on a Mustang Dyno on 91 Octane
I made 286whp and 328wtq
Tuned by Rallinspired Rick

Graph:

Last edited by MichaelUWright; Sep 21, 2011 at 04:34 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 07:21 AM
  #2  
dazz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
286whp is kinda low with all your mods even on the Mustang dyno.
What was the max boost tune at?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Were the AFR's tuned? Hopefully the jaggedness in the graph was due to filter value 0 or something.

Still it's a decent power upgrade over stock so must still feel quite a bit better.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #4  
MichaelUWright's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: CA
The boost is at 26psi and im also on the stock clutch

The reason the dyno sheet looks like that is because the tuner didnt smooth the graph at all, its raw data

Last edited by MichaelUWright; Sep 21, 2011 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 03:46 PM
  #5  
MichaelUWright's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: CA
and yea it feels like a whole new car compared to the stock tune

and for reference the baseline with the bolt ons, on the stock tune was 241whp and 245wtq

Last edited by MichaelUWright; Sep 21, 2011 at 09:26 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
RALLInspired's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Originally Posted by Hiboost
Were the AFR's tuned? Hopefully the jaggedness in the graph was due to filter value 0 or something.

Still it's a decent power upgrade over stock so must still feel quite a bit better.
You are correct sir. Compare the jaddedness to the baseline. They are very similar. I usually smooth the graphs between 25-50 but i did not in this case.

Rick B.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
JReid's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by dazz
286whp is kinda low with all your mods even on the Mustang dyno.
At 26Psi as well... I am kind of wondering why so low.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
Ladogaboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by MichaelUWright
and for reference the baseline with the bolt ons, on the stock tune was 241whp and 245wtq
I'm wondering if that is a super-stingy dyno, because those numbers, with bolt ons, seem lower than what a stock '11 should dyno at.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
Luixevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Ladogaboy
I'm wondering if that is a super-stingy dyno, because those numbers, with bolt ons, seem lower than what a stock '11 should dyno at.
This dyno defitenely seems to read lower than others but we must understand that every dyno is different and whats important are the gains On this very same dyno my 2011 100% stock X baselined at 218whp and 240lb-ft
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 05:15 AM
  #10  
Alpha X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 1
From: Blaine County, San Andreas
Hmmm that is odd. My car just recently got tuned and has far fewer mods done and is putting up better numbers than that. Anyone know why?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 05:55 AM
  #11  
laxplayer14's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
yea the numbers def seem low, even on a mustang dyno, ive pretty much got the same mods (granted diff brands) minus the intercooler and chad was able to put it just over 300whp on the mustang
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 07:36 AM
  #12  
xezerax's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
He is tuned on 91, I'm sure that has something to do with it.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #13  
ugakirk's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 47
From: Evans, GA
Originally Posted by xezerax
He is tuned on 91, I'm sure that has something to do with it.
+1 91 and a heartbreaking dyno are not a good combo..
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 08:58 AM
  #14  
MIVEC 4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn NY
thats really low dude
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2011 | 09:00 AM
  #15  
Ladogaboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: CA
What do you guys think? How much whp does 91 octane versus 93+ octane cost you?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 AM.