Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

451whp FP Black Stock Block 2011 GSR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2011 | 03:55 PM
  #16  
badreligi0n's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 1
From: Panama City, Florida
Edit, Nice numbers!

Last edited by badreligi0n; Dec 7, 2011 at 03:57 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2011 | 05:15 PM
  #17  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by evoforstevo
Ah ok that makes Sense. Didn't know that exhaust was restrictive
Better than stock of course, but in my opinion there are less restrictive options that will definitely make more power at the same boost level.

I offer as evidence the ETS V2 that was on Igor's EvoX made 440whp at 28psi on the FPBlack in an MR. It had all the same mods as Will's car with the exception of Kelford B cams because the S2X was not available.

The exhaust was a little too loud for Igor driving down the road so we switched JUST the muffler setup to the ETS Quiet setup (which is WAY larger than this muffler) and dropped 20whp. All of that was done on an MR which loses more power than the GSR. I have seen stock MR trans eat 9.5-10% power more than the GSR so that would have put Igor something like 480s? Add an O2 dump and that can climb another 20whp on the stock turbo let alone on a Black which really might pick up.

Aaron
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2011 | 05:19 PM
  #18  
troyracin54's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: florida
niiiiiiiice
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2011 | 11:47 PM
  #19  
ademarco's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: High Desert, CA
Is the ETS quiet version that much more restrictive? This is the perfect power level for the X. I am going to try and replicate this in the future once the warranty runs out.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #20  
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 9
From: Seekonk, MA
Nicely done Aaron

-Jamie
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 12:13 AM
  #21  
jfeo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
wow sick numbers must be a blast to drive!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 09:33 AM
  #22  
Alpha X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 1
From: Blaine County, San Andreas
Awesome numbers!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #23  
EvoStig's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: KCMO
Nice #'s!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 11:44 AM
  #24  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Thanks guys
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #25  
hpmx18's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Florida
looks great awesome
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #26  
Nickzorz91's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New York
Is this build safe on the stock block because the wtq is capped at 360? What kind of HP will it take before needing new pistons/rods?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 07:24 PM
  #27  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
We have made over 400 ft lbs on stock bottom ends without issues so far.


....well other than clutches
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #28  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
We have made over 400 ft lbs on stock bottom ends without issues so far.


....well other than clutches
I don't think 400 is the problem, i made over 400 for like 15k miles. It was the 460 ft/lbs that windowed my block.

I think 400ish is just a "safe" area, but still not for sure.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 12:55 AM
  #29  
EVO X 6950's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by murlo26
I don't think 400 is the problem, i made over 400 for like 15k miles. It was the 460 ft/lbs that windowed my block.

I think 400ish is just a "safe" area, but still not for sure.
To the op, great number, and that tq curve looks smoooooth.

@murlo how long did you run the 460 wtq before the block went? Mine isn't sleeved and was just wondering if 420 wtq would be "safe"
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 08:35 AM
  #30  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by EVO X 6950
To the op, great number, and that tq curve looks smoooooth.

@murlo how long did you run the 460 wtq before the block went? Mine isn't sleeved and was just wondering if 420 wtq would be "safe"
It was my rods that went not the sleeves, it was the stock block. Not long at all we'll say.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 AM.