Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Phantom X Evo's Dyno results. 2.2L PTE6266 on E85 PRS Tuned 595whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #61  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
Originally Posted by murlo26
Assuming you have the rpms to not shift to fifth 130 will get you what you say.

That is why I have an overbore motor. So I can rev to 9k+.

I am thinking I can hit 132ish traps in my car will a bit of gutting it. I want that high 10.
i should be able to stay in 4th gear up to 129 mph ish i have sheps 4.30 final drive, shifting @ 8200-8300 rpm i baby my car.. we will see
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2012 | 10:38 AM
  #62  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
u should be in low 11's not 12's babying off line with 130 mph in full weight car and pushing it you should be high 10's
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 07:18 PM
  #63  
StancedEvoX23's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 1
From: Tallahassee
very nice man! good seeing you this past weekend
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #64  
2003evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: FLO-RIDA
i was at prs today and thought i saw the car out front any update i could be wrong they had about 10 evo's there
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:01 AM
  #65  
Phantom X Evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Way Down South Georgia
Originally Posted by StancedEvoX23
very nice man! good seeing you this past weekend
Thanks man, you too. I'm glad you didn't stick around though, because we didn't quite get things worked out and I left the car there.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:03 AM
  #66  
Phantom X Evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Way Down South Georgia
Originally Posted by 2003evo8
i was at prs today and thought i saw the car out front any update i could be wrong they had about 10 evo's there
They do have a lot there. I tried calling yesterday, but didn't get through and forgot to call back after the first attempt. So no update yet.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 06:55 AM
  #67  
PRS's Avatar
PRS
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
I'll give you a ring today brother.

Ray
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #68  
BakaUnchi's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: SlowCal
Originally Posted by PRS
His car was squatting A LOT under the power. He also spun on the dyno on a couple runs
why not run it in 4th? your run has got to be in 3rd since it only took 2 seconds

here is a 4th gear pull loaded properly on a mustang..... see how long it takes?



Just wonderin....
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 05:49 AM
  #69  
ravnos04's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Springs, Co
not trying to knock your build or tuner...but does Cobb's dyno read higher than the one you were on? chkmgnt59's 2.1 6266 build got almost 750whp. What is diff about the builds/tune besides the fuel and boost? I am trying to get a 6266 2.2 build going and want upwards of 700whp.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 07:48 AM
  #70  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
The one baka posted isn't a 6266, its a 5758.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #71  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
He's talking about mine. Phantom will make the same power I did, he had ignition issues which stopped them from going further. Cobb's dyno also does read higher than this one IIRC, about 6%. I'm also running 4-5psi more boost, and I have everything in the engine bay ported, which I don't believe he does.

The 6266 will make 700+ all day, don't worry about it.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 01:39 AM
  #72  
ravnos04's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Springs, Co
Originally Posted by chkmgnt59
He's talking about mine. Phantom will make the same power I did, he had ignition issues which stopped them from going further. Cobb's dyno also does read higher than this one IIRC, about 6%. I'm also running 4-5psi more boost, and I have everything in the engine bay ported, which I don't believe he does.

The 6266 will make 700+ all day, don't worry about it.
Thanks bro! Super excited about this build, . Debating on the injector size though. I've seen both DW1300 and FIC2150 for e85. Some people have stated that the 2150's is a bit too much and driveability degrades vs. the 1300's. Any input on that?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 06:55 AM
  #73  
chkmgnt59's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: DFW
I'm having the same debate. I'm in the mid-70's IDC on pump and c16, so the 1300's don't have room for e85. The 1680's should be recalled like ID did with theirs, so I'm scared of those injectors, and the 2k's suck on pump if you ever have to run it. I might just skip e85 for a while
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 07:06 AM
  #74  
PRS's Avatar
PRS
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Cobbs dyno does read higher as stated. Plus the difference in fuels puts more stress on the ign system. Plus there were some issues with car. Sorry for lack of updates as soon as we get some more new we will update with new dyno sheet.

Thanks for all the questions though! Everyone will love this turbo kit!

Last edited by PRS; Apr 3, 2012 at 08:30 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 05:18 PM
  #75  
B^t's Avatar
B^t
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Home
Nice power.....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:15 AM.