Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

RT Tuning FTW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #1  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
RT Tuning FTW

I finally installed my Toxicfab tubular manifold. We did one dyno pull without any adjustments. The first pull put me over 500whp on a AWD mustang dyno.

RT tuning in Lansdale is by far the most professional tuning shop I have ever used.


Attachment 183552
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 02:12 PM
  #2  
BlueX702's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 19
From: Las Vegas
Nice numbers!

Are you happy with spool up or are you guys going to work on getting it faster?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Originally Posted by BlueX702
Nice numbers!

Are you happy with spool up or are you guys going to work on getting it faster?
Gotta tell you she feels like she spools faster than before. This morning on the highway she pulled from 80-100 mph insanely quick. I feel my car just breaths more free now.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 04:04 PM
  #4  
Riddle's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: New York
What was your car sitting at number wise before then install?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 07:15 PM
  #5  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Around 466whp
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 06:21 AM
  #6  
keshav707's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Boston MA
500whp, im sure that car eats everything else on the road.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 06:21 AM
  #7  
keshav707's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Boston MA
Originally Posted by Riddle
What was your car sitting at number wise before then install?
yes what were the baseline runs?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 06:54 AM
  #8  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
this place has a really bad reputation of using high correction factor.. i was told by multiple local people their mustang reads 12% higher then a dynojet.

with that said, lets see the correction factor and full print out data of the dyno run.. i doubt they will share it.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 07:09 AM
  #9  
08GsrX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
And subd lol I wanna see the print out as well! Or atleast a baseline for your car so we can see the difference.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 07:29 AM
  #10  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
+1 for RT/Tuning in Lansdale!

Been using those guys for years with excellent results. Vince, Pat and all the guys @ RT/Tning are VERY knowledgable about EVO's and cars in general. Anytime I have a question about something, whether its regarding my setup, how to make the car handle better or whatever, they always have the answer. Hope that doesn't come off as a sale pitch cause its not meant to be. I just am a very happy customer!
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 08:32 AM
  #11  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Originally Posted by tscompusa
this place has a really bad reputation of using high correction factor.. i was told by multiple local people their mustang reads 12% higher then a dynojet.

with that said, lets see the correction factor and full print out data of the dyno run.. i doubt they will share it.
Easy bro, I heard the exact opposite about mustang vs dynojets. I have the baseline or the tune before the manifold and the new pull on the same graph. As for my reputation I"m old and modify my car as a hobby so stop hating.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 09:49 AM
  #12  
Vince@R/TTuning's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Lansdale, PA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
this place has a really bad reputation of using high correction factor.. i was told by multiple local people their mustang reads 12% higher then a dynojet.

with that said, lets see the correction factor and full print out data of the dyno run.. i doubt they will share it.
Hey Guys, we will be more then willing to share any info needed. As far as the correction factor on our mustang dyno, it is calibrated to read like a dynojet. How we came up with this calibration is from the several years and 1000's of tuned AWD cars on a dynojets, from stock to heavily modified. Dynojet dynos are not adjustable from a calibration standpoint and is the reason they are the industry standard. Now mustang dyno's have a calibration value that is adjustable. There is an acceleration and coast down procedure that you perform and it gives you a value. You perform this procedure 4 times and take the average of the 4 and that's the value you enter. When we were performing this procedure(probably about 40 times total) we had a variance of about 10% total with all of the averaged values. Depending on how the car coasted down and how you accelerated it gave ya different numbers. We feel this is the reason why so many mustang dynos have different readings. So at that point we decided to calibrate the mustang dyno to be as close as we can get it to dynojet values. We did this by dynoing about a dozen cars that we have already tuned on dynojet dynos as well as many stock cars that have dynojet dynos done and the info is easily availble. We have found that our mustang is within a couple percent of dynojet readings. I also have alot of technial data of how accurate dynojet dynos are from the many parts testing and R&D we have done for manuufacuers. I feel that info above was pretty forth coming so please assume what we will share and not share.

Keep in mind here at R/T tuning we own and operate both a Mustang dyno and a Dynojet dyno, how many shops can say that. Tscompusa, what dyno do you own and operate over a dozen times a week? Either way dyno numbers are just numbers and we dont get too wrapped up in them.. When ever possible we try and get a true baseline before tuned so we can show the actual percentage gained regardless on what dyno it is.

With that being said this is the first time I have heard anything about our dyno's reading high, so I am pretty shocked to hear we have a "bad reputation" for that. I will see if I can post whatever you need later today. We have dozens and dozens of stock vehicle baselines as we as fully tuned dyno graphs in SAE or whatever correction factor you need.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
08GsrX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
I just wanted to see the before and after charts! Interested in the difference.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #14  
Vince@R/TTuning's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Lansdale, PA
^^^ the OP has an attachment of the dyno in his first post


Also mods, if you feel this is an advertisement I apologize. I simply wanted to clarify a few things.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 11:17 AM
  #15  
AWD96's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 425
Likes: 21
From: Winchestertonfieldville (Rochester, NY)
I've said it before and I'll say it again..Trap speed is key.

If your happy with it OP, then that's all that counts.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:01 PM.