Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2012 Evo X - MHI - 93 - Boostin tuned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 12:13 PM
  #1  
formerSTIowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: rockford, il
2012 Evo X - MHI - 93 - Boostin tuned

Picked up the car last Friday after a few more bolt ons, including a new FP MHI 18k turbo. Ended up at 384 whp and 327 wtq at 26psi on 93 octane. For reference, when stock I believe it made ~220 whp.

Mod list:
ETS V2 Quiet TBE, recirc, resonated test pipe
ETS 4" FMIC (black, blue stencil) and U/LICP
ETS intake
MHI turbo, ported by BP
OEM exhaust manifold, ported by BP
GS 3 port EBC
Synapse BOV
FIC 1100
Aeromotive 340 lph fuel pump
TWM full shifter cage

Overall feels extremely good. Pulls to redline versus feeling flat with the stock unit. I think it makes for a great dd turbo.
Attached Thumbnails 2012 Evo X - MHI - 93 - Boostin tuned-mhi-evo-x.jpg  

Last edited by formerSTIowner; Jun 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
sinople1's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Poplar Grove, Illinois
nice numbers buddy ill have to check it out one of these days!
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #3  
formerSTIowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: rockford, il
Thanks. Now just need to decide what's next for more power. I think I'm running out of easy options besides building the motor...
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 12:57 PM
  #4  
nbpal4000's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: on earth
keeping tq number low for longevity? Isnt stock block/rod good under 400 wtq ? and one more question if you wouldnt mind. how much for all those set up? just ball park figure.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
formerSTIowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: rockford, il
Yes, keeping tq low for stock block/rod longevity. Under 400 tq is a function of dyno too - 320 on this mustang could be ~370 on dynojet, or more.

For everything, including labor I'd guess around $8k. I also have a TWM shifter cage, short shifter, and bushings that is about $700 of that. It was done in a few series, so I could have saved some by doing it altogether - I did a completely stock with EBC and tune, then TBE, intake, and IC piping and tune, then turbo, fuel, IC, and tune. Doing all at once would have cut out two tunes. That said, I like seeing how each phase has impacted the curves.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 05:57 PM
  #6  
nbpal4000's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by formerSTIowner
Yes, keeping tq low for stock block/rod longevity. Under 400 tq is a function of dyno too - 320 on this mustang could be ~370 on dynojet, or more.

For everything, including labor I'd guess around $8k. I also have a TWM shifter cage, short shifter, and bushings that is about $700 of that. It was done in a few series, so I could have saved some by doing it altogether - I did a completely stock with EBC and tune, then TBE, intake, and IC piping and tune, then turbo, fuel, IC, and tune. Doing all at once would have cut out two tunes. That said, I like seeing how each phase has impacted the curves.
thanks for your input. your evo must feel really nice.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2014 | 06:50 PM
  #7  
formerSTIowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: rockford, il
My what? Why yes, yes it does.

Thanks man.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
richiivu's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Pretty nice numbers for the mods.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 07:14 AM
  #9  
ChipperEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 499
Likes: 15
From: Buffalo, NY
dang from all the threads about this turbo, I am really itching to do this upgrade. Got to take care of the DTC codes first though...

Nice numbers OP. looks solid.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #10  
formerSTIowner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: rockford, il
For me reliability was a big component of the purchase. It 'should' be OEM quality and last quite some time. Too new to know for sure, but that is the logic.

It is a great daily driver turbo. Provides enough grunt to keep you ahead of most cars, sounds better, and 'shouldn't' stress a stock block 'too' much. Again, time will tell.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 08:35 AM
  #11  
khmerguyx's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: MN
E85!!
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 10:17 AM
  #12  
Prosdoc's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Chicago,IL
Looks nice! I'm actually considering almost the exact same set-up as you and have been in touch with Boostin to get it done. Only difference is I don't have a BOV. My turbo blew so I need to upgrade and the MHI is a top choice. As far as the injectors, are they maxed out or is this still room for E85 in the future if you want?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 06:11 PM
  #13  
ademarco's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: High Desert, CA
What mileage and conditions did your stock turbo go out?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 06:27 PM
  #14  
oscarquinones's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Hinesville
nice numbers
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 09:36 PM
  #15  
Prosdoc's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Chicago,IL
Originally Posted by ademarco
What mileage and conditions did your stock turbo go out?
It happened at around 12k. I bought the car new, had bolt ons(cb,hfc,3 port,intake,tune,uicp) done in December. Not sure what caused it though
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 AM.