Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Intakes, Fuel Trims, and AFR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #106  
Whitewind's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Gillette Wyoming
Originally Posted by tephra
yeah im working on disabling the LTFT affect on WOT...



tephra man your a PIMP!!! Thanks for all your hard work man!
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 10:44 AM
  #107  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
Hiboost, just as an FYI - even on a completely stock car, my LTFT changed between +2.5% to +4.5% within the span of a few hours. It seemed odd to be that it was fluctuating that much in a single day, but I also did have a modified high cruise timing map (43*) on the car that day. I didn't do much cruising overall though, as I was mainly out data logging WOT runs that day.

Good to know I'm not the only one fluctuating 2% or 3% on the same day/same fuel etc. It's possible that driving at 75 mph for a bit will yield different LTFT's from driving at 60 mph based on numerous factors, I'll have to do more testing to see if increasing the timing is reallly effecting the trims.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #108  
YaroRS's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
guys, why can't we run the car in the open loop all the time ?

Also we have 7 latencies, which one should I adjust to correct STFT and LTFT ?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #109  
Whitewind's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Gillette Wyoming
Something about it knocking like crazy at idle. Forgot where I read this at... hmmmm...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #110  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by YaroRS
guys, why can't we run the car in the open loop all the time ?

Also we have 7 latencies, which one should I adjust to correct STFT and LTFT ?
I usually adjust all of them by a percentage but the important ones are the 12 - 14v range since that is where your car is running assuming it's healthy.

As for runing all the time in Open Loop it can be done but you have to tune the AFR's for all kinds of part throttle and cruise combinations below around 100% load. Get it wrong and you are going to have some drivability problems. I know when I tried it for a lean burn cruise it wasn't just going to be an on/off switch but I would have to tune the car to behave like it did with O2 sensor feedback starting on the rich side and working my way leaner.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #111  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Anyone have any clue how a phenomenon like this is happening.

I-LTFT +2%
C-LTFT -7.5%

I have DW800cc Injectors. This is what I had for LAT/Scale
Name:  INJLAT_SCALE.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  112.1 KB

Should the formula for scaling be (800CC x 532CC) / 550cc OR 600cc???

Thanks!!!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 10:24 PM
  #112  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by Clipse3GT
Anyone have any clue how a phenomenon like this is happening.

I-LTFT +2%
C-LTFT -7.5%

Should the formula for scaling be (800CC x 532CC) / 550cc OR 600cc???

Thanks!!!
That's way off from what I have. I've attached my settings that I found were alot better than what DW supplied with the injectors. I do have cams and different intake but it shouldn't be too far off for dialing in.

I've given these settings to a number of people and so far, no complaints.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:34 PM
  #113  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by SiC
That's way off from what I have. I've attached my settings that I found were alot better than what DW supplied with the injectors. I do have cams and different intake but it shouldn't be too far off for dialing in.

I've given these settings to a number of people and so far, no complaints.
Thanks, I give these numbers a test.

I will have to dial in my injectors with the stock intake, and then add the intake and MAF settings from COBB and dial that in.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #114  
MR White's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Bringing this thread back from the dead. NJ, how are Evo IX's affected by intakes, LTFT, AFR etc. I read your post on the funky AFRs and I've noticed that my AFR richens a whole point from 3500-6000rpms a few days after a tune or flash. To counter this should I adjust injector scaling, latency, MAF scaling, or just disable leanspool all together? I'm just running a open element intake, TBE, MBC and a self tune with ecuflash.

Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #115  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
what was your LTFT (mid) when you had it tuned?

like its 9% now - what was it when you tuned it?

Your trims are both about 9% - so you can reduce your injector scaling 1 jump and then retest..

DONT FORGET YOUR FUEL MAP ALSO REQUIRES CHANGES.. so get a WB
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 09:49 AM
  #116  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by MR White
Bringing this thread back from the dead. NJ, how are Evo IX's affected by intakes, LTFT, AFR etc. I read your post on the funky AFRs and I've noticed that my AFR richens a whole point from 3500-6000rpms a few days after a tune or flash. To counter this should I adjust injector scaling, latency, MAF scaling, or just disable leanspool all together? I'm just running a open element intake, TBE, MBC and a self tune with ecuflash.

You have two ways of doing this:

1. Lower the injector scaling from 513 to 472. That will lower BOTH the idle and cruise trim equally and should bring them as close to zero as possible. The downside is that you must re-do your AFR cruve. Lowring the scaling makes the car run richer and you must lean her out in the fuel map. That is the approach that I took.

2. Add latency in 12-19v range. Adding 0.05-0.07ms should bring the mid-trim down to 3-4% and that should negate its impact on the AFR during WOT operation. The idle trim will go down further and might become negative. But the idle trim is not adding fuel during WOT, it is the mid-trim that is the culprit. The upside to this is that you do not have to redo your fuel map; latency changes do not have an impact on the fuel map.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #117  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by nj1266
You have two ways of doing this:

1. Lower the injector scaling from 513 to 472. That will lower BOTH the idle and cruise trim equally and should bring them as close to zero as possible. The downside is that you must re-do your AFR cruve. Lowring the scaling makes the car run richer and you must lean her out in the fuel map. That is the approach that I took.

2. Add latency in 12-19v range. Adding 0.05-0.07ms should bring the mid-trim down to 3-4% and that should negate its impact on the AFR during WOT operation. The idle trim will go down further and might become negative. But the idle trim is not adding fuel during WOT, it is the mid-trim that is the culprit. The upside to this is that you do not have to redo your fuel map; latency changes do not have an impact on the fuel map.
Good info, I knew the Injector Scaling effected the WOT maps but now it makes sense that the latency never effected them since they never seemed to alter my tune.

I ended up using the LTFT disable coding to lower the crossover threshold of where LTFT is not added into WOT operation and I ended up bringing my Injector Scaling down a notch to make everything richer again so that I could tweak it a bit starting from the richer side of things. Right now it seems to be working great and the AFR's are really stable.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 11:05 PM
  #118  
MR White's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
nj1266 what do you think of using a lower crossover threashold to high LTFT's to negate the impact of the mid LTFT adding fuel?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #119  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by MR White
nj1266 what do you think of using a lower crossover threashold to high LTFT's to negate the impact of the mid LTFT adding fuel?
Tephra says that he got the code for the X from the 8/9. So if it works on the 8/9, then you might as well try it. That will eliminate the impact of the cruise trim at WOT.

I have not tried it on my 9, so I do not know if the code will work.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 08:03 AM
  #120  
jamesanderson1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Folsom
Thanks for providing all these pics of all parts of your car. They are good and very helpful fir selecting a new car.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 PM.