EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-engine-management-tuning-forums-257/)
-   -   Can someone explain (timing related Q) (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-engine-management-tuning-forums/541965-can-someone-explain-timing-related-q.html)

tephra Feb 27, 2011 02:53 AM

Can someone explain (timing related Q)
 
https://img196.imageshack.us/img196/...coldtiming.png

Can someone explain why the car should have MORE timing when the Coolant Temp is cold?

The percentage modifier gets applied to the timing table - so once the car is warm we have 0% of whatever is in the table...

Forget that they are called EGR - I think thats plain wrong...

This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm

Cheers
D.

xhomm02 Feb 27, 2011 04:47 AM


Originally Posted by tephra (Post 9112246)
https://img196.imageshack.us/img196/...coldtiming.png

Can someone explain why the car should have MORE timing when the Coolant Temp is cold?

The percentage modifier gets applied to the timing table - so once the car is warm we have 0% of whatever is in the table...

Forget that they are called EGR - I think thats plain wrong...

This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm

Cheers
D.

According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.

I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-)

E-Spec@Tach Motor Works Feb 27, 2011 08:11 AM


Originally Posted by xhomm02 (Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.

I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-)

Right on the money!!{thumbup}

mrfred Feb 27, 2011 08:26 AM


Originally Posted by xhomm02 (Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.

I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-)

I think its timing retard puts more heat in the exhaust. There are cat efficiency tables that retard the timing when the engine is cold. This same cold engine ign advance table is in the CT9A ROMs. Perhaps cold engines need more advance to create a more complete burn. At any rate, I find it comical that both advance and retard tables exist.

2.4evo Feb 27, 2011 01:59 PM


Originally Posted by xhomm02 (Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.

I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-)



I just asked the same question and I got very much the same answer.

tephra Feb 27, 2011 03:48 PM


Originally Posted by mrfred (Post 9112530)
I think its timing retard puts more heat in the exhaust. There are cat efficiency tables that retard the timing when the engine is cold. This same cold engine ign advance table is in the CT9A ROMs. Perhaps cold engines need more advance to create a more complete burn. At any rate, I find it comical that both advance and retard tables exist.

Exactly...

I will have to look up the coldstart tables and see what their conditions are..

RazorLab Feb 27, 2011 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by tephra (Post 9112246)
This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm

Cheers
D.

I know I've told you this already, but mine does the same thing (knocking on load transition when cold) and I've been trying to get rid of it for months, driving me crazy.

Tephra can you get that table(s) for my rom?

55590107 (Your 2010 RA Tephra ROM)

EDIT: I have the main one:

<table name="EGR Timing Advance" address="57359" category="Timing" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing">
<table name="Load" address="61778" type="X Axis" elements="9" scaling="Load"/>
<table name="RPM" address="6175e" type="Y Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>

RazorLab Feb 27, 2011 04:02 PM

Another question:

I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms.

With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing"

Tephra, do you know which is correct?

fostytou Feb 27, 2011 04:07 PM

I was always under the impression that this was an absolute value that was mathematically applied as a subtraction to timing... but maybe I'm thinking about the other table.

RazorLab Feb 27, 2011 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by fostytou (Post 9113344)
I was always under the impression that this was an absolute value that was mathematically applied as a subtraction to timing... but maybe I'm thinking about the other table.

Yea it would be nice to know what it is. If you set it to 0 with "Timing" then it's -20 with "Min Timing".

I want 0, not -20 so I would like to find out for sure.

tephra Feb 27, 2011 05:00 PM

emailed...

tephra Feb 27, 2011 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by razorlab (Post 9113330)
Another question:

I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms.

With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing"

Tephra, do you know which is correct?

Give me the address of the table your talking about and I will look it up...

old4g63 Feb 27, 2011 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by mrfred (Post 9112530)
I think its timing retard puts more heat in the exhaust.

What he said.

tephra Feb 27, 2011 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by razorlab (Post 9113330)
Another question:

I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms.

With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing"

Tephra, do you know which is correct?

I just looked this up, in your ROM its all 10's right?

The scaling is Timing, but what happens is that under certain conditions the ECU interpolates between this map and the regular timing maps.

After about 50C it doesn't use this map at all...

Golden Feb 27, 2011 06:22 PM

Isn't this the map that controls that?

(for the 2010 maps)

<table name="Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs Coolant Temp" address="561bc" category="Timing" type="2D" scaling="Percent255">
<table name="Engine Temp" address="61310" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="TempFarenheit"/>
</table>


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:48 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands