AMS is a direct bolt on correct? No modifying?

 

If ARC has "the best intercooler in terms of efficiency and design technology", then it would be nice if they shared the results against which this statment is based. Please see my earlier post on this matter:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=363585&page=5

Bottom line: as with some earlier post herein, until we have comparative data that demonstrates differences in performance, at least relative to OEM, our ability to discern which is the "best" FMIC from a performance point of view, we are just "pissing in the wind".

Later, Ken

 

I have never been blown away by the ARC stuff...

cb

 

I did a before and after on my 4" ets ic and gained 8whp...

^ idk if anyone is interested in that....

If I did it all over again.. I would probly get a 3.5"

 

Threads like this always turn out bad, hopefully this will stay clean!


The 3.5" intercooler is one of our most popular sellers. If anyone is interested I received an email from one of our UK customers with this link.

http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=228681

Regarding some testing they did. We will have our testing done and released shortly.

Thanks,

Michael

 

I'm waiting for a cheap generic to come out on ebay.

 

wow thats some good data that actually proves something, I was leaning towards AMS but now I may just go with ETS, not sure what size as I would like to avoid any cutting, would the 3.5" be a direct fit w/no cutting, or would I have to go w/3" ??

 

3.5" requires no cutting and 4.0" requires a couple spacers behind the crash beam, but no cutting.

Thanks!

 

Hold tight. It won't be too long.

 

I'm looking at the ams. However I want a stealth fmic. Just somethin bout a black fmic that seems sweet to me. I've seen one ams black with red letters. Hoping they still offer this when I go to buy a fmic

 

How about you do a Griffin overhaul? Had one on my WRX. They claim better airflow than any manufactured IC.
http://www.griffinrad.com/