Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

BeaterX gets an EF4, thanks MAP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:02 AM
  #16  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Well that was assuming ideal VE like I mentioned, if Scheide's car is 90% efficient we'd be more in the 62 lbs/min range.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:22 AM
  #17  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Chris-

if you guys sell any local to us, let me know- Id love to see what one does on our dyno!

cheers

CB
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:28 AM
  #18  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by CBRD
Chris-

if you guys sell any local to us, let me know- Id love to see what one does on our dyno!

cheers

CB
Chad I would be interested but I need more fuel and to finish my tune.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:29 AM
  #19  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
When you swing by to Dyno you seriously need to motivate me to set up my hybrid boost control lol
You're just using 3-port right now right? Nothing wrong with that at all sir! For me, I like having the hybrid setup, I can manually change boost if need be quickly w/o a laptop, but still get the control of customizing the boost curve.

Originally Posted by jyamona
what are the pro's of running these hybrid 3-port / mbc setups?
Just kinda what I mentioned above. I've posted some write-ups and diagrams on how it's setup in the ecuflash section, PM me if you cannot find them. It's a nice mix of the ease of adjustability of a MBC but still help eliminate taper that these stock-frame turbos enduce.

Originally Posted by murlo26
Keep revving it out you wuss! Its still climbing.
LOL this was not on a dyno, I just was doing pulls on my way home from work I consistently rev the car to a hair over 8000 but looks like now I will get a little more by revving it higher, who knows!

Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
69 lbs/min.
That is both manly and funny at the same time. I love it.

Originally Posted by CBRD
chris-

thats cool- wasnt trying to put you on the spot-

the BBK is a fairly large comp wheel/turbine---- so to make more peak power- id suspect its WELL over 60 lbs min, 69 is quite a bit- thats ALOT more than a 35R-

cb
BBX you mean!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #20  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by scheides
LOL this was not on a dyno, I just was doing pulls on my way home from work I consistently rev the car to a hair over 8000 but looks like now I will get a little more by revving it higher, who knows!
Mine pulls all the way to 8800 for the most part. The boost curve could use a little more wgdc I think up top and it wouldn't drop off at all. I bet yours will pull all the way to 9k unless you start to max the turbo
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #21  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
scheides-

yep- i made the mistake others make- LOL i meant BBX!

cb
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #22  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
How close do you figure you are to maxing out the new pump at this power level?
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #23  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Close. I was running 33psi at ~7500rpm during an initial pull and AFRs were at 12.5. Lowered boost to 31 up top and it's now in the high 11's. This sucks because it's on E70. I'm going to need to do something once E85 comes back in a few months. Gah the cycle continues!

I will post this in the walbro 400 thread too.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 01:35 PM
  #24  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
ps my MAF is now hitting 4.93v on my 3.5" intake around 8100. Weeeeeee!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #25  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by scheides
ps my MAF is now hitting 4.93v on my 3.5" intake around 8100. Weeeeeee!
That's a lot of airflow...
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 01:47 PM
  #26  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Time to go speed density. I wonder what mine would be being I run a 4 inch intake? Half inch makes a big difference.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #27  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by cursedsm
Time to go speed density. I wonder what mine would be being I run a 4 inch intake? Half inch makes a big difference.
The X comes standard with SD from the factory It uses both the MAF and speed density.

Also our MAF is a hotwire MAF, so if he really needed to he could just go to a custom 4" intake (or really just 4" maf housing) and it would give him a ton more room.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 02:15 PM
  #28  
scheides's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by Kracka
That's a lot of airflow...
Originally Posted by cursedsm
Time to go speed density. I wonder what mine would be being I run a 4 inch intake? Half inch makes a big difference.
Ricer math kinda works out...I made 380whp at DB Performance on my stock MAF housing, 3.5" intake cross-sectional area is 1.39 times bigger, 1.39*380=529whp, or about 610whp on a dynojet.


Originally Posted by murlo26
The X comes standard with SD from the factory It uses both the MAF and speed density.

Also our MAF is a hotwire MAF, so if he really needed to he could just go to a custom 4" intake (or really just 4" maf housing) and it would give him a ton more room.
IDK if I'm ready for that level of commitment I'll prolly just rock the 3.5" and push it to the absolute limit, I'm guessing I won't quite flatline it, no biggie.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 02:29 PM
  #29  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by scheides
Ricer math kinda works out...I made 380whp at DB Performance on my stock MAF housing, 3.5" intake cross-sectional area is 1.39 times bigger, 1.39*380=529whp, or about 610whp on a dynojet.




IDK if I'm ready for that level of commitment I'll prolly just rock the 3.5" and push it to the absolute limit, I'm guessing I won't quite flatline it, no biggie.
Yea I don't think a 4" is necessary for stock frame either, you should be alright. Your rice math seems about right honestly. I figured about the same, I thought 610-620whp dynojet was about where the EF4 will run out. I made 495 on 27psi at DB so I think 530 on 32psi or so is possible.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 02:29 PM
  #30  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 298
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by murlo26
The X comes standard with SD from the factory It uses both the MAF and speed density.

Also our MAF is a hotwire MAF, so if he really needed to he could just go to a custom 4" intake (or really just 4" maf housing) and it would give him a ton more room.
That is good to know. They are doing the sd setup like they do on most of the Chrystlers and Gm cars. Learning more about the x is interesting, but as Kracka suggested go drive one. Having a hard time finding a dealer out here letting me. All the info is still good to know for when maybe one falls in my lap as my 8 did.

Originally Posted by murlo26
Yea I don't think a 4" is necessary for stock frame either, you should be alright. Your rice math seems about right honestly. I figured about the same, I thought 610-620whp dynojet was about where the EF4 will run out. I made 495 on 27psi at DB so I think 530 on 32psi or so is possible.
I will tell you it helped my car out alot. I mean clipping wasn't available when I ordered my turbo, but I noticed a huge difference obviously when I went from my Buschur 2.5 intake to a 4 inch off my talon that I had to use.

Last edited by CurseDSM; Feb 2, 2012 at 02:32 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.