EvilRob

And you can say that because they posted the US numbers somewhere? Please post a link I want to check some other specs out.

EzeE1o

youve got to be kidding me, every US mag has said 295 hp and 300 lb ft of tq so far, and 280 hp and 311 for the jdm...yea the official specs are not out yet but so far every us mag has stated those numbers

EvilRob

Ok so you are telling me old info that is not confirmed by mitsu yet. THANKS I DIDN'T KNOW THAT ALREADY.

Also since every US magazine can't seem to agree on a 0-60 time I should ***-u-me it's 6 seconds because that's the slowest time I read.

EzeE1o

i didnt say anything about 0-60 times

and mitsu has released a more "confiremed" 295 / 300 figure rather than your 311 figure

http://media.mitsubishicars.com/deta...43595&mime=ASC

show me where they said the USDM one would be 280 / 311

garcias2k

iTrader: (5)

I vote yes, but I think this is a car that needs to grow on me still.

EvilRob

I don't want to keep arguing with you but the only confirmed numbers are the JDM numbers and those are 311.

The mitsu site even states right by the numbers posted (est) as in estimates.

Go to honda you wown't see the (est) next to their numbers.

"i didnt say anything about 0-60 times" Yeah but you said you got your numbers from a magazine and I just pointed out that those numbers could be as far off as their 0-60 times that's all.

EzeE1o

what does honda have to do with anything? look, im just going by what every car magazine and that mitsu page has reported. if it is 280 and 311, then so be it.

EzeE1o

the thing is that 0-60 times do vary between magazines and thats y im not talking about 0-60, but hp figures do not vary....and so far all US mags have shown the same 295 and 300

EvilRob

Do I seriously have to explain every part of my post to you? I could have said chevy, ford, toyota, nissan. What I'm trying to point out is that on those sites, cars already released have set specifications. There is no (est) at the end of HP or TQ because they have their numbers and arn't just guessing because that model is out. So what I'm getting at is the 300 tq (est) is just that an estimate it's not confiremd and that is why I said thanks for the old info (that's not confirmed yet). (don't mean to sound like an ******* but I just hate explaining myself)

EzeE1o

lol, i thought you were just being sarcastic about the honda comment since i have an rsx....some of the evo x haters here say stuff like "gtfo u drive a honda" or something like that

EvilRob

Oh didn't even notice you drove it, so umm... gtfo u drive a honda j/k

max2evoix

iTrader: (8)

it looks like a jacked up volvo

Mystique

It think its a vast improvement over the old one.

pltek

iTrader: (33)

its not even funny anymore to listen to the "haters", just look at the poll results, vast majority 3 of 4 people say YES

Prediction: Wait till end of next year when mod/tuning market is in full swing for the X and U2 will be saying YES.

Until then, keep hating yourselves

lemmonhead

I thought there would be more no, at least that what all the post I been reading led me to believe.