Edmunds comparison of IX and X
http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2007/08...-brochure.html
but i cant see the numbers
/stupid/ i'm keep looking though
but i cant see the numbers
/stupid/ i'm keep looking though
yeah they dont have a crash beam too. and no brembos and Enkei's. Also the Lancer ES interior.
But the bottom line is you can shave weight alot on the X. And it is not that hard , definitely if you will race.
But the bottom line is you can shave weight alot on the X. And it is not that hard , definitely if you will race.
nice car... haha but still dont understand about how they rave and rant about how threer going to replace the "old heavy iron 4g63" With a new lighter faster 4b11.. ummm but the X is heavier than any of the evos uhhh doesnt make sence they stripped alot of weight and added EVEN MORE... im not a fan of the car... looks interior everything... but what can i say the interior on all the evos sucked @ss....
The X has more safety features put in ... thus even if the engine is lighter the car as a whole is heavier ... how does that not make sense?
And if you're such a big fan of the VIII and/or IX ... the question you should really be asking yourself is ... How does the heavier X without a significant power boost over the VIII and IX still pull in such good times in comparison?
The answer my friend ... evolution.