Notices
Evo X How Tos / Installations Post or link to your detailed how to / installation articles in here. If you have any questions regarding the how tos, feel free to post them in the Request sub-forum.

How do you lose weight on the X?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #76  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
^ ^^i did kinda this above
I have Artisan Exhaust
KW V3 coil overs
Gram light rims
Toro R888's tires
No crash beam's
Empty trunk
Small battery

With full tanks of gas my car is under 3300 LB.
But i have a GSR.

i hope i didnt forget something.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #77  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by Fair
The EVO X isn't light, esp. the MR:


Initial weighing of our 2008 EVO X MR. This is with a completely full tank of fuel but the spare + jack removed. The Subwoofer can be removed for -16.4 pounds, and another ~75 pounds of fuel would be removed for autocross use, so that makes race weight ~3520 pounds.


Weight for EVO X GSR with full tank of fuel. Lose 75 pounds for race fuel load (autocross use) to get to around 3450 pounds

For race use, all of this needs to come out:



Stock wheels are heavy, even the "lighter" EVO X wheel.


Factory EVO MR 18x8.5" wheel and 245mm Advan tire, 46.8 pounds. Wheel alone is over 21 pounds.


Factory GSR wheel and tire = 48.2 pounds

Of course buy an aftermarket downpipe and such, but you can lose even more if you have a lightweight after-cat exhaust built (with thin wall 3" tubing):


This set-up went from 45.1 pounds to 23.8 pounds. We're making another iteration that will have a removable rear muffler section to lose 10 more pounds (it was way too quiet).

Bye bye fogs!


3 pound drop, but more importantly it unblocks coolers on both sides

A well made set of coilovers is always a weight savings, some of which is unsprung weight:



Cheers,

kinda wierd the BBS only 1.4 lb lighter then a Enkei. specially for the money it cost the BBS.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #78  
switchblade906's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 859
Likes: 1
From: フロリダ州
both set of rims look ugly
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #79  
blackchiney's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: florida
Does replacing the stock springs with the eiback pro kit save on any weight unsprung weight?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #80  
Fair's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by blackchiney
Does replacing the stock springs with the eiback pro kit save on any weight unsprung weight?
No.

But as I said before - going to good coilovers will net you a loss in weight. We just installed some AST EVO X struts the other day:


EVO X MR Bilstein strut and OEM spring + top mount = 19.4 lbs


EVO X AST 4200 front strut with Vorshlag camber-caster plate and Hyperco spring = 13.1 lbs

That's almost 13 pounds on the front end alone, for the pair.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #81  
lallen3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: CC
Originally Posted by finallyaevowner
mitsu made the MR to use new two-piece rotor construction to reduce weight. (The 2-piece disc is 2.9 pounds lighter per wheel 11.6 lbs in just different rotors why is it that the fancy automatic get the cool toys The MR model is also equipped exclusively with Bilstein shock absorbers and Eibach springs guess it is the only way to sell them sorry for the rant just tired of seeing the automatic in most of the test and comparsons seems like there are really pushing hard to get them moving but anyway my point 11.6 lbs lighter for better rotors
Naa. only the fronts, rears are same as GSR
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #82  
lallen3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: CC
Carbon: Doors (4) front fenders & bumper, decklid, hood. Save a "ton" of weight, but costs a fortune. Supposedly it's stronger than the factory metal.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 07:11 PM
  #83  
Spunkysandoval's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: so cal
did anyone mention removal and or drainage of the washer fluid reservior?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #84  
victor6466's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: pomona, ca
I kick my girlfriend out that car for good and i got rid of about 130 lbs.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #85  
bradze's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: yelm, wa
sorry to say, but unless its a track only car you're wasting your time.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #86  
DJ Brett B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: salt lake city
nobody mentioned this- If you are getting light weight rims pay attention to how much the tires weigh- total up the wheel+tire combo weight when selecting rims and tires, just to see what I mean... a lot of times the difference in tire weight can be as much or more than your stock wheels vs. aftermarket. Lower the rotational mass, it has more significant impact that simply removing weight in general from elsewhere on the car. lighter weight brake rotors were mentioned too, and same concept applies for those.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #87  
DJ Brett B's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: salt lake city
usually replacing items with expensive carbon fiber items is not as cost effective as adding power- remember, its all about good power to weight ratio that makes your car FAST. Take weight of car and divide it by horsepower. Adding 20 hp makes your car faster than removing 100 lbs for instance.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #88  
Fair's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by DJ Brett B
nobody mentioned this- If you are getting light weight rims pay attention to how much the tires weigh- total up the wheel+tire combo weight when selecting rims and tires, just to see what I mean... a lot of times the difference in tire weight can be as much or more than your stock wheels vs. aftermarket. Lower the rotational mass, it has more significant impact that simply removing weight in general from elsewhere on the car. lighter weight brake rotors were mentioned too, and same concept applies for those.
Agreed. The factory wheels aren't very light but unfortunately a lot of the wheels out there are pretty heavy. Here's out EVO X setup:


L: Stock BBS 18x8.5" and 245mm Advan = 46.8 pounds. R: Enkei 18x10.5" and 265mm AD07 = 48.5 pounds


Wheel alone was 21.6 pounds.

In this case the extra 2 pounds of wheel/tire weight was mostly in the tires, but it still dropped lap times by over a second (peaks of 1.4g lateral grip - not bad for 180 treadwear street tires). If we could get lighter wheels in this size we'd have them.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #89  
MrBonus's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
From: DE
Fair, were you able to fit those without spacers?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 02:03 PM
  #90  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
the RPF1 is lighter... but the offset stinks (+15). Cheaper too

I oh so scientifically (bathroom scale) weighed my 18x10.5 RPF1s to be around 19#.

19.7 according to the specs: http://www.enkei.com/spec_charts/RPF1.pdf
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 AM.