Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

2.5 or 3" exhaust piping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #1  
veilside prius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
2.5 or 3" exhaust piping

whats the best pipe diameter for your TBE if you don't plan on changing the stock turbo?

Last edited by veilside prius; Dec 27, 2007 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
Boost3dxEvO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (135)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
3" will flow well for the stock turbo and you won't have to upgrade later if you go bigger (:
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #3  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Boost3dxEvO
3" will flow well for the stock turbo and you won't have to upgrade later if you go bigger (:
AS proved by Buschur 3" flows well even up to 600+ whp with a mere 5-10whp difference between a 3" setup and a 3.5" setup.


Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Alright, I hit my goal of 150 mph trap speeds with my RS. I was happy......for about a minute Now I am on my winter quest to gain even more horsepower than I had.

Last week we re-installed my SSR wheels and Toyo tires, the car is much nicer on the dyno with these tires.

Then last Friday I brought the car in and built a complete 3.5" V-band exhaust for it. I wanted the lightest muffler I could find so I ordered a 17" long Burns Stainless muffler, weighed about 4.5 pounds. When it was all finished the entire 3.5" mandrel bent stainless exhaust system came in at 38 pounds from the turbo back. This is 8 pounds heavier than our 3" system I took off the car.

I loaded the car on the dyno, made no changes to the tune or boost and made two back to back pulls.

We then took the car off the dyno, put the 3" exhaust back on the car and did two more back to back pulls.

Below are the two dyno sheets. The #1 run on each one is the 3.5" exhaust, #2 is of course the 3" exhaust.

First dyno sheet is:

3.5" made 661 whp and 620 torque
3" made 669 whp and 617 torque



2nd dyno sheet is:

3.5" made 669 whp and 603 torque
3" made 659 whp and 599 torque



The testing, as far as I am concerned was a complete wash and I can't call either system a winner in the testing. As far as what I am going to do, I am leaving our 3" system on the car, it's quieter, lighter and I see no power gains averaging the two charts.

I did go back and measure the outlet size of the GT35r turbine housing, it is only 2.5". I know for certain that as the exhaust wheel/housing gets larger going up in the exhaust size is going to help but for a GT35r or smaller and from what looks like 700 whp and under there just isn't any change in power to say it does or does not help.

BTW, for the haters, it would be very easy to change the testing results (as would any other test I have ever done) to show that EVERYONE needed to upgrade their current 3" exhaust to a 3.5". I have (15) 3.5" exhausts on our shelf right now. That's not how I operate, never has been, never will be. The test is what it is and I guess it is going to take a few years of installing GT42r's on street cars to use up this tubing I have................

Last edited by RoadSpike; Dec 27, 2007 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 03:08 AM
  #4  
krazirob's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1
From: Destin/Fort Walton Beach, FL
3in GO FOR IT.........you wont regret it
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:45 PM.