Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

Is 350whp attainable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #1  
MEVOLV3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 1
From: Seminole
Is 350whp attainable?

'03 E8
Mods:
-stock IX turbo
-Megan tubular 02 housing
-3 in TBE; DP/SP/Apex'i WSII muffler
-Perrin complete turbo intake
-Hallman MBC
-Muse LICP
-IX DV
-Walbro 255

Coming soon...
-TTP Mustang dyno tune on 93 octane

Really want to stick to a "Stock turbo/full bolt-on status," but will entertain the idea of Kelford or Cosworth 272's if needed...(No meth or water injection though)

Thanks for any input!

Last edited by MEVOLV3; Jan 21, 2010 at 03:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #2  
CoachG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 524
Likes: 3
From: Central NJ
With cams, a good tune/tuner, and on a Dynojet you should be in the right neighborhood.

Good luck,
Coach
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #3  
Protostar1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Depends big time on the dyno, but I hit 371whp on AMSs dyno with our only difference being an IC and piping (which I believe I got about 20whp with a perrin filter).
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #4  
chaotichoax's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (149)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,108
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
on a "typical" mustang dyno...no, not on pump gas (excluding e-85)

a typical evo 9 can make 330-350 whp on a dynojet on 93 octane

a typical evo 8 needs cams to match a stock cammed 9's numbers on 93 octane

Last edited by chaotichoax; Jan 21, 2010 at 12:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:00 PM
  #5  
oneofakindtrini's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: New York
Depending on your tuner that should be attainable.. Look into some cams though. Perhaps some kelford 272's or something such as that.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #6  
borievoinitialD's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: florida
i am at 360 currently on a ttp tune on his md dyno...

u will need cams in my opinion to reach the goal

I have pretty much everything u have plus hks 272's and a DLI
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #7  
MEVOLV3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 1
From: Seminole
Will the valvetrain need upgrading if I run either of those cams?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
borievoinitialD's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: florida
i have no idea about kelford or cozzies, but you dont for the hks's...that kinda played into my decision as I wanted around 345-370 with minimal lag
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #9  
evo unknown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 1
From: Orange County, NY
Originally Posted by CoachG
With cams, a good tune/tuner, and on a Dynojet you should be in the right neighborhood.

Good luck,
Coach
^^Good advice

You probably can obtain that number with turning the boost up pretty high, 24-25 psi, or you could install cams, spring, and retainers and definitely get those numbers while keeping the boost lower.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #10  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by chaotichoax
a typical evo 8 needs cams to match a stock cammed 9's numbers on 93 octane
this is it, exactly

Originally Posted by MEVOLV3
Will the valvetrain need upgrading if I run either of those cams?
you dont need them , but why not get them if youre already going to be in there. they are nice insurance
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #11  
MitsuJDM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
You'll need atleast a set of cams and be somewhere around 310-330whp. 350whp on a mustang is real good power with bolt-ons.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
mifesto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, NJ
You'll get roughly 340's with a conservative tune , I'm estimating. Maybe 320-330 if u didn't get the cams. Fmic will also help to hit that 350 reliably while keeping the tune conservative...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #13  
oneofakindtrini's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by mifesto
You'll get roughly 340's with a conservative tune , I'm estimating. Maybe 320-330 if u didn't get the cams. Fmic will also help to hit that 350 reliably while keeping the tune conservative...
A perfect example of this would be a about 2weeks ago, E-Spec was tuning a GG evo9 and with less boost the car made more power because there was too much restriction from the stock intercooler and a cat. A larger FMIC will help you out on your way up to 350+AWHP, as well as cams.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #14  
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
if you get a TTP tune, he will manipulate your numbers so you can have as much power as you want. haha
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #15  
MEVOLV3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 1
From: Seminole
awesome feedback guys! keep it coming
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 AM.