Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

Best turbo for 2.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 06:59 PM
  #16  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Originally Posted by 2theMAX
Really dude? The best turbo for a setup IS ones opinion. That makes me arrogant for having an opinion? This was his comment "thought I'd see what turbos you guys are running on your built motors." I can put a period after my post when that is the turbo I use only. Yes, that is my personal opinion. GTFO.
It is your opinion yet you just say the turbo, you don't give any insight into why you feel the way you do.

T67 Period.

That's not helpful to the OP, if you would have intergrated your reasoning in your second post into your first post it woulda been a great post but, T67 period is helpful to the OP how?

And then GTFO? Like my feelings should be injuried
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #17  
grim~'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 3
From: Austin Tx
Precision 6262

/thread
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #18  
SyZyGy1394's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 3
From: INDIANA FOO!
Try out the new HKS stock frame one! I wonder what it would spool at?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #19  
SRTRaceR04's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by wreckless969
It is your opinion yet you just say the turbo, you don't give any insight into why you feel the way you do.

T67 Period.

That's not helpful to the OP, if you would have intergrated your reasoning in your second post into your first post it woulda been a great post but, T67 period is helpful to the OP how?

And then GTFO? Like my feelings should be injuried
You better hurry up and get to the hospital before there are permanent feelings damage!!

I agree with what you're saying. At least backing up a bold statement like that with a little bit of insight would go better.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 10:02 PM
  #20  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Originally Posted by SRTRaceR04
You better hurry up and get to the hospital before there are permanent feelings damage!!

I agree with what you're saying. At least backing up a bold statement like that with a little bit of insight would go better.
I'm in Iraq so I actually had to yell for a medic.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2010 | 11:38 PM
  #21  
Mwolf83's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Cass Lake, MN
AMS 900x kit formerly the 850R, just better now. Which is a Precision 6262 but slightly modded to get another 50whp without loss in spool time. My friend has the 850R on his 2.0l and it spools fairly quickly without losing much low speed drivability and makes 520awhp with just basic supporting mods (1000cc's, walb 255, hks 280's, TBE, and a tune).
And there is another guy in my area that had the same kit on an AMS 2.3l stroker that made 740awhp on a Dyno Dynamics Dyno, in shootout mode (supposedly like a DynoJet) it made 840awhp. So its quite the turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 02:12 AM
  #22  
pettyboy69's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: idaho
precision makes awesome turbo's i would have to agree with the guys on here i would probably go with a 6262 or a 6265
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #23  
Boostin4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Mwolf83
AMS 900x kit formerly the 850R, just better now. Which is a Precision 6262 but slightly modded to get another 50whp without loss in spool time. My friend has the 850R on his 2.0l and it spools fairly quickly without losing much low speed drivability and makes 520awhp with just basic supporting mods (1000cc's, walb 255, hks 280's, TBE, and a tune).
And there is another guy in my area that had the same kit on an AMS 2.3l stroker that made 740awhp on a Dyno Dynamics Dyno, in shootout mode (supposedly like a DynoJet) it made 840awhp. So its quite the turbo.
I wouldn't know what to do with 840awhp!
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #24  
Boostin4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by pettyboy69
precision makes awesome turbo's i would have to agree with the guys on here i would probably go with a 6262 or a 6265
That seems to be a popular answer.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 02:57 AM
  #25  
Mwolf83's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Cass Lake, MN
Originally Posted by Boostin4life
I wouldn't know what to do with 840awhp!
I'm sure you could figure it out real quick, I know I would. Also there is a thread around here about Ivey tuning a 2.4l with FP Black, makes 600+(https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-fp-black.html). And 500+ for over 4000rpm, would be a very fun street turbo, especially if you sent it to Owen Developments (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...l-bearing.html) for the ball bearing center section.
Imagine 500+whp at about 3300rpm......Yum.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #26  
Boostin4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Mwolf83
I'm sure you could figure it out real quick, I know I would. Also there is a thread around here about Ivey tuning a 2.4l with FP Black, makes 600+(https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-fp-black.html). And 500+ for over 4000rpm, would be a very fun street turbo, especially if you sent it to Owen Developments (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...l-bearing.html) for the ball bearing center section.
Imagine 500+whp at about 3300rpm......Yum.
yea I want as much as possible but need to build the tranny and all that to handle the big power.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #27  
EVO IXMR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by grim~
precision 6262

/thread
+1!!!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #28  
Boostin4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Been thinking about the precision 6765.... also thinking about the forward facing mani. Car isn't a DD so whats input on the forward facing mani's?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #29  
vr4_rider's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: America
Originally Posted by Mwolf83
I'm sure you could figure it out real quick, I know I would. Also there is a thread around here about Ivey tuning a 2.4l with FP Black, makes 600+(https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-fp-black.html). And 500+ for over 4000rpm, would be a very fun street turbo, especially if you sent it to Owen Developments (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...l-bearing.html) for the ball bearing center section.
Imagine 500+whp at about 3300rpm......Yum.
What makes up the FP black? I know FP makes it (from the name) but why do they call it "black"? And how does it make so much power so fast?

What's the FP Red?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #30  
C.Gonzalez's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Boostin4life
Been thinking about the precision 6765.... also thinking about the forward facing mani. Car isn't a DD so whats input on the forward facing mani's?
I am just about done with my 2.3 6765 setup. I also have a toxicfab front face manifold. It all depends on the kind of driving/racing your going to do with the FF manifold. I like to go to the drag strip and do highway pulls plus I will be driving my car often. My 2.3 was originally set up with a fp black on pump gas and it was fun for a while but it was time to step up. I did get the car tuned on C16 and 38 or so lbs and that was a killer ride but the race gas was pricey to be on kill as often as I wanted also E85 wasn't available to me then. Now I'm going E85 and 6765 I was going to go with the 6262 but I got a killer deal on a 6765 so I decided to try it out. I can always go to a 6262 or a EFR 8374 or 9180. I am aware that the 2.3 doesn't turn the rpm a 2.0 or the other variants do plus it seems like the 4g63 block is limited on power due to the cylinder splitting I hear reports of. I plan to keep keep it at 35 or so lbs until I figure out my next motor/turbo combo.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 PM.