Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

New 08 Lancer , not feeling it ... headlight is kinda like ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #16  
Jim in Tucson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Caliber cousin

I agree, AutoXer, performance is the key with me as well. However, it is possible to build a really ugly "performance car". Look at the Dodge Caliber, which is supposed share the same chassis with the new Lancer. I sure hope they don't beat the Lancer with the same ugly stick!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #17  
res04's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
IX values are going to hold nicely if this is the new Lancer.

Rear deck height is way too high, the traditional Evo wing wont look good at all at this level and they will be hard pressed to make the Evo aggressive looking with that shape and lack of angles on the car. Probably good for Lancer sales, not for Evo's usual aggressive looks.

The platform takes the already high stance of the IX and goes one step further. This is borderline pickup truck ride height and stance!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #18  
mtags24's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
the caliber is imo the ugliest car to come out within the past 5 years. i've sat in one, driven one, and was shocked at how i disliked it so much

i can't imagine mitsu could do worse than dodge in the aesthetics department. new lancer looks nice. hate the headlights in this photoshopped pic though
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #19  
xtremeboost's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
bad , bad idea !! This may be one of those plans which looks better on paper ! lets all remember where the EVO comes from ( breed = rally car ) and look where it may be going - not the best idea !!!



Frank
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #20  
gnusmaS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Europe
lol

you're talking nonsense

you guys think platforms form the chassis, suspension system ...., that's not what the platforms are about

platforms are about location of various things ( like door handles), and the car's layout (front mounted engine, forward wheel drive....) and safety structure....

read this

http://blogs.edmunds.com/karl/355
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 05:35 AM
  #21  
prj.evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: STCE, IL
if the car looks anything like that, Im sure my mom will like it, as she loves her 2001 Galant
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #22  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
yep

chrysler has come out with a whole bunch of UGLY cars, they drive like crap too.

thats pretty pathetic in 21st century, add to that the fact that diamler is a the same company. then again, i think that mercedes is a ****ty car too.

i pray that the new evo has NOTHING to do with these piles of poop

Originally Posted by mtags24
the caliber is imo the ugliest car to come out within the past 5 years. i've sat in one, driven one, and was shocked at how i disliked it so much

i can't imagine mitsu could do worse than dodge in the aesthetics department. new lancer looks nice. hate the headlights in this photoshopped pic though
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #23  
xtremeboost's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by pltek
chrysler has come out with a whole bunch of UGLY cars, they drive like crap too.

thats pretty pathetic in 21st century, add to that the fact that diamler is a the same company. then again, i think that mercedes is a ****ty car too.

i pray that the new evo has NOTHING to do with these piles of poop
thats ture !!!!
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #24  
silverbullet04's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: YONKERS, NEW YORK
ugly ugly ugly
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #25  
04lancerEsGuy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
looks all SUV status...
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #26  
Flybert's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: socal
AHAHAAHH mitsubishi will be closing down in no time.

And to the holier than thou guy above who said it's all about performance and not looks, give me a break!!! I'll take both please.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #27  
Tureno-AE86's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mitsupwr
thats not even close to the headlamps and barley close to the car. thats just a poor photoshop.

its funny how people act like they know wuz up
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:36 AM
  #28  
949's Avatar
949
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: socal
wow it looks like a diamante
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #29  
Rutt's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Japan
It looks like a pregnant or overweight RX-8
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #30  
Pete3kGT's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: 23rd Quadrant of the Gamma Sector
Does anybody on here realise that this is PHOTOSHOP?????

The only real picture is that night shot of the blue lancer, and it actually looks pretty damn good. Looks like Mitsubishi stuck with a lot of the Concept X design, which i think is awesome.

I can't wait till January when they show the production Lancers and production ready Evo X in Detriot.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 PM.