Top gear: X first drive
love your photos.
Oct 9, 2007, 10:53 AM
#32
And if the standards now are more stringent, than the HP numbers should further reinforce my statement.
Oct 9, 2007, 11:12 AM
#34
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the bay, Cali
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Er...that's fine and dandy...but don't berate me on math when you can't read. Take a look at the quote that I clipped. It says that the car had 276hp, which is to the best of my knowledge, less than 286hp.
And if the standards now are more stringent, than the HP numbers should further reinforce my statement.
And if the standards now are more stringent, than the HP numbers should further reinforce my statement.
and as far as the new stringent #'s, that means if the evo X was rated at the same standard as your evo 9, it would have moer than 295
for example, the 05 rsx-s has 210 hp, but for 06, honda rerated all their engines for the new SAE standard, so for 06 the rsx-s was rerated at 201, but its the same engine
Oct 9, 2007, 05:50 PM
#42
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oct 9, 2007, 06:12 PM
#44
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually think its ugly right now, but in time i will grow on it. But the 08 STI hatch on the other hand is very ugly and always will be haha.
Bring back the 04-05.
Bring back the 04-05.
