Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

91 and 93 octane and tuning

Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #1  
80210's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
91 and 93 octane and tuning

Quick question I couldn't find...

For a base flash with minimal mods (TBE and MBC), do you need two seperate maps for 91 and 93 octane for the car to be safe? Does the reflashed ECU account for the fact it may be running 91 and then 93 a few days later?

Are two seperate tunes needed? Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #2  
4wheel_motion's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
two seperate tunes would be ideal. you should tune for the octane you run normally.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #3  
bchang's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Boston, China & Taiwan
2 separate tunes would serve you best. Sure, you might not need it but it's always better to err on the safer side of things. Using 91 on a 93 map could cause ...

Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #4  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Well, the stock evo is tuned for 98 RON, ~93 octane here in the US ((R+M)/2 I think). We only get 91 octane here in cali and when I datalogged my car, I got 4-8 accounts of knock from 3.5k to redline.

I would say that you need a separate tune. I basically pulled ~4 degrees of timing from 1/3 of the timing map to keep it from knocking on 91 octane, otherwise completely stock car.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:37 AM
  #5  
80210's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
My real confusion is on the stock evo, you can use 91 or 93. I've been unable to take 3rd gear pulls at either, but I'm assuming its rich enough on either for there to be 0 counts of knock. So if the stock map can use both, why couldn't a tuned map? Does it have to do with the lack of a safety net with A/F ratios?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 12:56 AM
  #6  
4wheel_motion's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
if tuned right it could. but why?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #7  
fusionchicken's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: socal
with a higher oct. you're less knock prone so you can run more timing.

put in a lower oct. fuel on the above map and you're basically going to knock all over the place...

if you're 93 oct. map is very very conservative i guess you could get away with pumping in 91 oct....but what's the point?

if you only have 91 oct. like the cali people do, we usually get a 91 oct. map and a 100 oct. map, and change them around depending on our mood
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #8  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by 80210
My real confusion is on the stock evo, you can use 91 or 93. I've been unable to take 3rd gear pulls at either, but I'm assuming its rich enough on either for there to be 0 counts of knock. So if the stock map can use both, why couldn't a tuned map? Does it have to do with the lack of a safety net with A/F ratios?

No, like I said before, you WILL get knock using 91 octane. The ecu is just forced to pull timing to keep from grenading. It will also adjust the long term fuel trims, i.e. richen up. My high fuel trim was 126 before I started tuning on the car and the A/F ratio was somewhere way below 10.0 after 5.5k trying to prevent knock... which it still got.

My high fuel trim has since come down to 118 last time I checked, so it's starting to lean back out, I think. This is because I pulled quite a bit of timing so it's not knocking anymore.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #9  
Carloverx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: NJ
bumpin an old thread for two similar questions:

I have a 91 oct tune:

1. how much hp am i loosing over a 93 oct tune

2. is it possible i am running into problems as a result of ALWAYS using 93oct on
a 91 oct tune? I didn't choose a 91oct setup and it is hard to find anything but
93 around here. I assumed it wouldn't make a difference but i am starting to
question the power of the car. Could i be slowly hurting sensors by running it
too rich ...or ....? Sorry if this is a newb type of question haha.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 04:50 AM
  #10  
Bosshog's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
From: Istanbul
Would lowering the boost while keeping the same AFR / Timing maps help?

This would be like tuning for 93 octane map at say 24 psi tapering to 20 by 7k RPM and lowering the boost to 19psi in midrange tapering to say 17 psi at 7k RPM...

I am planning on doing something similar in my car as I can get 94 octane where I live, but might have to use 91 octane on long road trips if better fuel is not available. I have an AVC-R so I have low/high/off(running off wastegate) settings for boost... In case I have to use **** gas, I will put some octane booster and turn the boost controll off running of the wastegate or just lower to 19 psiş

Last edited by Bosshog; Jun 26, 2007 at 04:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #11  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by Carloverx
bumpin an old thread for two similar questions:

I have a 91 oct tune:

1. how much hp am i loosing over a 93 oct tune

2. is it possible i am running into problems as a result of ALWAYS using 93oct on
a 91 oct tune? I didn't choose a 91oct setup and it is hard to find anything but
93 around here. I assumed it wouldn't make a difference but i am starting to
question the power of the car. Could i be slowly hurting sensors by running it
too rich ...or ....? Sorry if this is a newb type of question haha.
at the same AFR the lower octane fuel has to run a bit less timing which can equate to significant power loss across the board.

Let me know via PM when you're ready and I can get you fixed up with a great 93 octane tune
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Harsh476
Evo General
17
Jan 9, 2016 09:58 AM
Creatre
Motor Sports
26
Nov 6, 2015 04:43 PM
vegasevo9
Evo General
4
Aug 23, 2008 06:46 PM
KawRider
Evo General
16
Feb 22, 2006 01:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 PM.