View Poll Results: What are you planning for your NON-EVO '08 Lancer
Turbo (non company specific)



30
35.71%
Supercharger (non company specific)



6
7.14%
Trade up to an Evo



17
20.24%
keep N/A



13
15.48%
Unsure



13
15.48%
Other



5
5.95%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll
Choices, Choices, Choices
I will have to suffer through the one-wheel burnouts, since autos can't get LSDs.
Wait, you're allowed mods now? I thought the parents put the smack down on you!
I would like to see a supercharger...im all about reliability these days...I pulled out too many hairs with a (aftermarket) turbocharged car being my number one source of transportation... now if this was a second car, or one just to mess around with, I would go turbo all the way, because I love boost, almost more than anything else...
Last edited by cspec; Aug 13, 2007 at 05:48 PM.
I would like to see a supercharger... but im all about reliability these days...I pulled out too many hairs with a (aftermarket) turbocharged car being my number one source of transportation... now if this was a second car, or one just to mess around with, I would go turbo all the way, because I love boost, almost more than anything else...
considering this engine was built for FI, I would slap a turbo on(and tune it like crazy to keep nice and reliable for everyday driving since everyone hopefully knows tuning is key), and research converting to AWD in the long term
This is the predicament I am in
I doubt that this engine was really built for FI. I'm sure the evo/RA engine will have several different key elements. I'm sure it will be similar to the difference between the 4g63 and the 4g63t. Also s/cs are not by design any more reliable. Thy simply serve a different purpose than the turbo.
I doubt that this engine was really built for FI. I'm sure the evo/RA engine will have several different key elements. I'm sure it will be similar to the difference between the 4g63 and the 4g63t. Also s/cs are not by design any more reliable. Thy simply serve a different purpose than the turbo.

In the end, we're just going to have to wait and see. With the 4G94, I'm sure it didn't take too long before people went "gee, my pistons melted, I guess they can't take much boost!" . . .
While I understand your comments, that doesn't make them Gospel.
AWD isn't the greatest thing in the world. I had a Subaru. Honestly, I wasn't impressed. I'm back to FWD, you'll notice.
As for "screw the turbo, wait for the Ralliart!" comments, how the Hell does that make sense? Was I supposed to drive around the same beater car waiting for the RA to come out? I needed a car now, I bought a GTS. Also, do we have hard facts on the RA? Not that I've seen. We have rumors about turbo and AWD, but for all we know it'll just be a 200hp Lancer (like the 04 RA was compared to the 4G94 Lancer). Don't pin your hopes and dreams on rumors.
Also, I dont get how u can even compare an AWD with a FWD.... handling... grip, etc.
OTHER - how come I never see the nitrous option in these polls?
decent mainly bolt on street N/A (piggyback, ram air, exhaust, header, TB, spacer, clean up intake/head)
and a bottle in the trunk.. to the tune of 100hp wet direct injection, and an RPM based controller to make it react more like a turbo or super
ofcourse this is no where near a immediate thing, but it;ll definately start within the first month of the car comming into my possesion (I hate waiting)
decent mainly bolt on street N/A (piggyback, ram air, exhaust, header, TB, spacer, clean up intake/head)
and a bottle in the trunk.. to the tune of 100hp wet direct injection, and an RPM based controller to make it react more like a turbo or super
ofcourse this is no where near a immediate thing, but it;ll definately start within the first month of the car comming into my possesion (I hate waiting)
I doubt that this engine was really built for FI. I'm sure the evo/RA engine will have several different key elements. I'm sure it will be similar to the difference between the 4g63 and the 4g63t. Also s/cs are not by design any more reliable. Thy simply serve a different purpose than the turbo.
I doubt that this engine was really built for FI. I'm sure the evo/RA engine will have several different key elements. I'm sure it will be similar to the difference between the 4g63 and the 4g63t. Also s/cs are not by design any more reliable. Thy simply serve a different purpose than the turbo.

