ClixT

iTrader: (2)

has anyone tried modifying their stock rom to accommodate these values?


https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...te-thread.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-dummies.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...s-like-me.html

EDIT: added some links

HornstarBU

iTrader: (7)

I thought about trying to add stuff like that, but then decided that I wouldn't need 2byte load since I was only hitting 100 or so and most people look down upon lean spool and just recommend turning it off.

Are you running the stock rom btw? and do you have trouble going lean in the upper rpm range? I thought everyone was trying to use the evo roms, but I guess if you're using the base rom, then it would make sense to add stuff like that, if you hit 160+ load values.

Actually, most people agree that 2byte to 1byte load conversion is the "cool" way to do it these days, and that 2byte load is soooo last year.

senate6268

iTrader: (20)

Only way to run these would be with an Evo-based ROM on the Lancer ECU. Anyone running a non-Lancer ROM has no reason not to be using 2-byte values for logging.

ClixT

iTrader: (2)

oh ok. im not running an evo rom.
so whats the most accurate load then for a stock rom?

HornstarBU

iTrader: (7)

Well, ecuload is plenty accurate under 160. You are using the stock rom though, with no problems getting the car to run rich enough? You're not turbo, right?

Mitsu.kid.02

iTrader: (3)

+1 are you N/A or have you begun your build?

ClixT

iTrader: (2)

im n/a.
ive been using load calculated for a long time now, and i just thought of 2 byte load now lol