quarter mile
Are you sure that's stock? That's a full 0.5 sec faster than the best we've seen for stock. I mean, good work, but it's just hard to believe... is this known for being a fast strip? Is it NHRA certified for surface and level?
Originally Posted by comegetme
i ran a 16.8@80 in a stock 03 lancer oz.ill post my timeslip once i find it
when you get a run in when thats just been done there is an improvement in times
I noticed this when my PB was 16.4 (running a set of semi slicks) that after the track was resurfaced i did my best PB of 16.2
but the only mods so far are a pod and 2.25 catback exhaust
rcefstsfecr on the time slip page ran better on his stock lancer 16.4
https://www.evolutionm.net/registry/...me.php?tid=144
https://www.evolutionm.net/registry/...me.php?tid=144
IIRC he bought his used and couldn't verify if he was in fact stock.... those times are almost a full second faster than the times reported by all the car mags and the people who've gone with stock cars. If we were pulling mid 16's stock then we'd get more respect. Fact is, there's no conceiveable way a stock 4G94 powered Lancer is going to pull a 16.xx
Trending Topics
i ran 16.6 with only a muffler back when i first got my lancer, its all in the driver, my first couple of times i ran 17s, went down to 16.6 without any more mods, after i got cai and headers and still got same time...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




