Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

quarter mile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
comegetme's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: san fran
quarter mile

i ran a 16.8@80 in a stock 03 lancer oz.ill post my timeslip once i find it
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
crypto's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,429
Likes: 1
From: Fort Myers, Florida
nicely done
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #3  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
Are you sure that's stock? That's a full 0.5 sec faster than the best we've seen for stock. I mean, good work, but it's just hard to believe... is this known for being a fast strip? Is it NHRA certified for surface and level?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:50 PM
  #4  
Animal's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
Originally Posted by comegetme
i ran a 16.8@80 in a stock 03 lancer oz.ill post my timeslip once i find it
16.8 in a stock lancer... was that straight after they reheated/resurfaced the track?

when you get a run in when thats just been done there is an improvement in times

I noticed this when my PB was 16.4 (running a set of semi slicks) that after the track was resurfaced i did my best PB of 16.2

but the only mods so far are a pod and 2.25 catback exhaust
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #5  
lancerman360's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Lufkin, Texas
Dang thats good! I dont even run that quick
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #6  
lancer2show's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 1
From: newport news virginia
rcefstsfecr on the time slip page ran better on his stock lancer 16.4

https://www.evolutionm.net/registry/...me.php?tid=144
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #7  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
IIRC he bought his used and couldn't verify if he was in fact stock.... those times are almost a full second faster than the times reported by all the car mags and the people who've gone with stock cars. If we were pulling mid 16's stock then we'd get more respect. Fact is, there's no conceiveable way a stock 4G94 powered Lancer is going to pull a 16.xx
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #8  
Silens's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Valdosta, GA
i ran 16.6 with only a muffler back when i first got my lancer, its all in the driver, my first couple of times i ran 17s, went down to 16.6 without any more mods, after i got cai and headers and still got same time...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MalibuJack
Evo General
24
May 25, 2017 06:46 PM
MitsQueen
Evo General
31
Aug 20, 2002 12:30 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:42 AM.