Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Getting 150 HP from the 4G94

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #46  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by 02OZR
Helll no it doesnt match...

theres still 3mm in the upper part of the runner outlets... that being the whole reason to port it, and with out porting the 93 manifold, the ports r 3mm smaller then our stock 94 manifolds... inlet & outlets.
Point is you paid for a ported manifold. Seems like no one tried to port it and there was certainly no science behind it.

This a port
http://www.roadracemotorsports.com/ports.htm

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #47  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Yeah I got a RRM ported intake manifold from Greenpsycho (his hatred of RRM paid off for me) and it is ported big time. I could almost fit my arm in the manifold.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #48  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Yeah I got a RRM ported intake manifold from Greenpsycho (his hatred of RRM paid off for me) and it is ported big time. I could almost fit my arm in the manifold.
GOD HE DID HATE US! But when we port something, we actually port it, not fantasize about porting it! My new porter is even better than the oold one. He ports 380 h.p. N/A MIDGET MOTORS TOO! Very nice.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #49  
Animal's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
would porting the head side of a 93 manifold on a 94 give much more hp with a turbo on?

getting a td05-16g put on and want to reduce lag (well there may not be any seeings im looking at a water to air IC)
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 12:17 AM
  #50  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
No one knows since no one has dynoed a 93 manifold and 94 manifold back to back. I would wager that on a turbo setup the difference (if there is any) between the two manifolds is reduced as there would be enough pressure to overcome and flow differences.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #51  
Dem_z's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
...And so we come to the conclusion that getting 150hp out of your engine is not worth the money.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #52  
bene's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: g'boro
Originally Posted by Dem_z
...And so we come to the conclusion that getting 150hp out of your engine is not worth the money.
pretty much

120 whp is possible and worth it
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #53  
army685's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: Aurora IL
a friend of mine has ever bolt on you can think of and he runs low 15's sometimes high 14's and he has every bolt on you can think ofwithout turbo or nitrious so it is very possible
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 07:00 PM
  #54  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
A lot of our customers report to us that they are in 14s or low 15s N/A. That is very respectable for sure. A lot of time people do not take into account traction as a key to good 1/4 mile times too, so........

ROAD/RACE

Last edited by ROCK; Dec 20, 2006 at 08:54 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #55  
blaze_125's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Header back (with stock cat) +
Sri +
Ported Intake Manifold +
PiggyBack
---------------------------
125 whp
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #56  
Disruptorzero's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Ok, stupid question, but what is the stock lancer's wheel horsepower? I can't rememer and I was wondering just how much a gain 125 or even 150 is over stock and weather its noticable.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #57  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
100 or so.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #58  
Disruptorzero's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
I see, that sucks, now I definately need to get more power outta my car. I think going turbo is a more sensical idea than trying to achive a lot of power via bolt ons, so I'll be saving for some time now....
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #59  
drucea's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: Central TX, Houston, and Huntville, TX
Yeah, turbo is really the only way to get decent power. The only plus side to going N/A is saying that you put down this much power with no turbo, but really you won't get anywhere over 200hp
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #60  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
We need to all make sure we speak the same language....... WHEEL h.p. or CRANK h.p. Remember manufacturers always talk in terms of CRANK h.p. not wheel h.p.

ROAD/RACE
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 PM.