2008 Lancer 0-60 times
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Canadia
im gonna bring some new life to this thread
i have the 08 gts 2.0 my mods are rrm timing module,rrm sri,rrm crank pulley and custom ab exhaust , the times from my runs were with those 4 mods and i had 20 psi in my front tires and 5 spd manual on stock rims and stock rubber launching at 2000 rpms , night time runs , temps were around 18-20 degrees
my 0-60 was 6.8 and my 1/4 mile was 16.3
im finding alot of increase in the 0-60 times with the na mods , but not so much in the 1/4
edmunds has their stock tested at 9.1 0-60 and 16.8 1/4 mile with cvt
i have the 08 gts 2.0 my mods are rrm timing module,rrm sri,rrm crank pulley and custom ab exhaust , the times from my runs were with those 4 mods and i had 20 psi in my front tires and 5 spd manual on stock rims and stock rubber launching at 2000 rpms , night time runs , temps were around 18-20 degrees
my 0-60 was 6.8 and my 1/4 mile was 16.3
im finding alot of increase in the 0-60 times with the na mods , but not so much in the 1/4
edmunds has their stock tested at 9.1 0-60 and 16.8 1/4 mile with cvt
Last edited by Infamous_pt4; Sep 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Costa Rica
The 2.0L lancer is very slow.
Edmunds yes 9.1 secs with cvt 8.8 secs 0-60 with manual.
But hey, achieving magazine numbers is quite difficult. Those are the best of the best numbers u can get usually.
Car and driver gets faster numbers.
If I were in the USA, I would of trade the 08 for an 09 gts. Nice engine improvement.
Even thou, for the money I paid for a GT where I live, in the USA I wouldn´t be driving a lancer at all haha.
Edmunds yes 9.1 secs with cvt 8.8 secs 0-60 with manual.
But hey, achieving magazine numbers is quite difficult. Those are the best of the best numbers u can get usually.
Car and driver gets faster numbers.
If I were in the USA, I would of trade the 08 for an 09 gts. Nice engine improvement.
Even thou, for the money I paid for a GT where I live, in the USA I wouldn´t be driving a lancer at all haha.
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: bacalarr
cvt are a lot slower, if you bought an automatic why would you even bother with acceleration times, its ridiculous... automatics are for going to the supermarket with the kids not clocking its acceleration
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: bacalarr
Evolved Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: chatham VA
The 2.0-liter GTS five-speed we tested ran 0-to-60 in 7.7 seconds
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0WzUj8HPR
2.4L
0-to-60 time by six tenths to 7.3 sec, and its quarter-mile time dropped by four tenths to 15.7 sec at a trap speed of 87.7 mph, up 1.9 mph
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0WzWM3pGh
also this is my 1/4 mile times.
60ft 2.66
330ft 7.25
1/8ET 10.9
1/8MPH 67.8
1/4ET 16.6
1/4MPH 85.08
the temp was 70 and im not sure the elevation.
and i have a CVT
from road and track they state that the CVT 0-60 is 8.5 sec.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0WzUj8HPR
2.4L
0-to-60 time by six tenths to 7.3 sec, and its quarter-mile time dropped by four tenths to 15.7 sec at a trap speed of 87.7 mph, up 1.9 mph
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz0WzWM3pGh
also this is my 1/4 mile times.
60ft 2.66
330ft 7.25
1/8ET 10.9
1/8MPH 67.8
1/4ET 16.6
1/4MPH 85.08
the temp was 70 and im not sure the elevation.
and i have a CVT
from road and track they state that the CVT 0-60 is 8.5 sec.
Last edited by ShadowES; Nov 15, 2009 at 08:17 PM.