Deciding on next mod
^No you are right...ver. 2 uses 89 and ver. 1 uses 91. I thought I heard ver. 2 gives us 02-03 guys rough idle alot and CEL and all...which the trade off for nice gains is probably worth it.
Originally Posted by sthiewes
^No you are right...ver. 2 uses 89 and ver. 1 uses 91. I thought I heard ver. 2 gives us 02-03 guys rough idle alot and CEL and all...which the trade off for nice gains is probably worth it.
With the software u can program it to have multiple maps on it and use one for a smooth idle but less power and the other for more power and a rougher idle.
Originally Posted by TEJ
With the software u can program it to have multiple maps on it and use one for a smooth idle but less power and the other for more power and a rougher idle. 
My personal opinion... Too many people complaining of this and that with Ver.2. If I had to buy again, I'd buy Ver.1 again.
Originally Posted by blaze_125
But that's only if you do it right, and if you invest in either dyno-tune time, or wideband, egt and logging device.
My personal opinion... Too many people complaining of this and that with Ver.2. If I had to buy again, I'd buy Ver.1 again.
My personal opinion... Too many people complaining of this and that with Ver.2. If I had to buy again, I'd buy Ver.1 again.
Actually, RRM reprogrammed mine to have a less rough idle and Rob and Boe have explaned how to program it without those things and still experience gains or a smoother idle.
Originally Posted by TEJ
Actually, RRM reprogrammed mine to have a less rough idle and Rob and Boe have explaned how to program it without those things and still experience gains or a smoother idle.
...program w/o those items Blaze said.
Originally Posted by sthiewes
I'm going to have to ask you to explain this
...program w/o those items Blaze said.
...program w/o those items Blaze said.

