Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

4G69 into 02-03

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
iyi0521's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
4G69 into 02-03

Lookin to try to swap 4G69 into the Cedia. I know its probably not cheap or maybe even possible, im just wondering what is actually different all the way down to the wiring.

Currently have a 02 Lancer OZ 5-speed with the RRM non ic.

picking up a 4G69 from a RA with 15k on it. Used and abused with snapped rod .

Now i know ill need the ECU and some misc wiring from a RA and probably the tranny. What else would make this swap possible or easier?




And yes i know that this will not be cheap and it would probably be easier/cheaper to build the bottom end of my 4G94 or do a 64 swap (which i might end up doing in the end ) but that is not the issue here. Just wanna know what the differences are.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Not sure what you mean by "swapping the 4G69 into the Cedia."

Your info says you have a 2002 OZ. Are you just calling that a Cedia? I'm confused.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #3  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
ECU
Wiring Harness
Tranny (or at least the bellhousing)
CV joints/axleshafts/intermidiary shaft, since the 4G69 uses an intermediary shaft
The accessories are different, too, such as the alternator, PS, and AC pumps. 4G69 only has 1 acc. belt instead of 2.
3 out of 4 of the engine/trans mounts are different, but bolt to the same holes on the body.
Header/DP are different. Not sure if you'll be able to keep the same catback, but probably not.
Throttle cable
Accel. pedal position sensor, since the 4G69 uses an electronic TB
Intake manifold

I honestly don't think it'd be that difficult of a swap, just an expensive parts list.

Last edited by otter; Oct 11, 2007 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #4  
drucea's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: Central TX, Houston, and Huntville, TX
Diavlo with an 04 Lancer in the UK swapped one into his car already and it turned out great. Search for him.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #5  
iyi0521's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
Not sure what you mean by "swapping the 4G69 into the Cedia."

Your info says you have a 2002 OZ. Are you just calling that a Cedia? I'm confused.
Yeah im just trying to differenciate between the 02-03 and 04+


Originally Posted by otter
ECU
Wiring Harness
Tranny (or at least the bellhousing)
CV joints/axleshafts/intermidiary shaft, since the 4G69 uses an intermediary shaft
The accessories are different, too, such as the alternator, PS, and AC pumps. 4G69 only has 1 acc. belt instead of 2.
3 out of 4 of the engine/trans mounts are different, but bolt to the same holes on the body.
Header/DP are different. Not sure if you'll be able to keep the same catback, but probably not.
Throttle cable
Accel. pedal position sensor, since the 4G69 uses an electronic TB
Intake manifold

I honestly don't think it'd be that difficult of a swap, just an expensive parts list.
So the whole drivetrain from the RA is a good idea as sourcing indvidual parts is gonna suck. Engine mounts from the RA and acc as well.

Originally Posted by drucea
Diavlo with an 04 Lancer in the UK swapped one into his car already and it turned out great. Search for him.
Thanx
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #6  
drucea's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: Central TX, Houston, and Huntville, TX
Yeah I'm confused by what you meant by Cedia as well. The 02-06's are all just lancers. Just call it an 02 Lancer, we'll know what you mean
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
iyi0521's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
Originally Posted by Diavlo
Having recently completed an engine swap to convert my UK 1.6 Lancer to the 2.4 MIVEC motor, I thought I'd compile this rough guide just encase anyone blows their motor and wants to go this route.

What I must stress however, is that it is NOT worth doing this swap to a perfectly good ES or OZ Rally, you might as well just trade in for a RA. I did not have that choice as the 2.4 is not available in Europe or anywhere except the USA, Canada, Australia and a few other far-off locations from the UK!

So heres my thoughts and a rough guide.

Summary

The previous engine was a 4G18, 96Bhp 1.6L powerplant, using a return-type fuel system.
The RA engine is 4G69, 162Bhp 2.4L powerplant with MIVEC, using a returnless-type fuel system.

How difficult was it?

Contrary to popular fanboy belief - it is very easy to swap to the 4G69, as everything bolts up, fits, and no custom work is required. It does however take a lot of money and time.

It is VITAL you make sure you have all the correct parts. It is not as simple as changing the engine. You need the new axles, the new transaxle, new wiring harness, ECM, tubes, fuel pump, and much more.

What did we anticipate would work but didnt?

We anticipated that we could re-used the transmission - we couldnt - it was subtly different. Short story - you need the RA transmission, changing just the clutch housing wont work.

We thought then after getting the new transaxle that we could re-use the old axles - WRONG! The RA axles are thicker, and old thinner axles wont turn in the RA differential.

What did work suprisingly?

The wiring harness for the engine connected up really well for the most part. On my car there was one particular plug C-124, that needed a few changes, but this may not be the case on a USDM lancer.

The engine started up without any major problems.

What parts did we need?

4G69 engine (doesnt matter if it is from AT or MT, but if it is from an Auto like mine was youll need a flywheel and clutch. Also make sure it has everything left on it, like the starter etc)
4G69 transaxle
4G69 drive axles
4G69 ancillaries if not on engine (ps pump, ac compressor, alternator)
ECM
Engine Wiring Harness
Exhaust
Fuel Pump

How do you do it?

In very simple steps:

1). Drain your fluids
2). Disconnect all wiring and hoses
3). Remove as much as you can from the engine to aid hoisting, such as the exhaust manifold.
4). Remove the engine. For this there are two options, either unbolt the transmission/clutch housing from the block and then take out just the engine, or you can drop the whole lot down if you can raise the car on a lift.
5). Remove the engine wiring harness and ECM
6). Prepare the car for the new engine, such as installing the new engine wiring harness and ECM. We also changed the clutch master cylinder but this is not necessary.
7). We put the new engine in with the transmission attached. This is difficult from the top so its better to drop the car onto it. If you remove all the brackets from the engine and get the header off of it, it will go in from the top.
8). Put in the new axles, then fill your fluids.
10). Check everything over, but it should be ready to roll now.

Dang it. So there is alot of crap that i still need to even make this viable. Im lookin at a 4G69 for cheap but there is no drivetrain or electronics or mounts included.

Anyone have a wrecked RA out there?

Last edited by iyi0521; Oct 12, 2007 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #8  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Not that I know of, but an Outlander may be handy for parts, too.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #9  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
I understand why Diavlo did his swap.

If one is living in the US, why do it. Might as buy a RA first (RA is nowhere near expensive as an EVO) . . . I hear the "xyz year has an ugly front bumper for the RA", ba humbug, it's much more cost effective to buy another bumper.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #10  
iyi0521's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
Yeah this is just a pipe dream.

We are just gonna rebuild the 69 with forged internals for a customer.

Thanks guys
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 10:12 AM
  #11  
fkdrcrs's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 1
From: MD
if your going to do a swap like that id go with an evo 4g63..........better results.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 PM.