Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

Stock Limitations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
tenkawa_akito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
Stock Limitations

A long time, Claudius started a thread about this subject for the 63 engines. I figure, why not start one for the 94s. If you have any information to the limitations of the stock parts of the lancer, be it rods, pistons, valves, exhaust, suspension, cup holders....go ahead and list it here. And since Claudius' thread has been yanked from the boards, we should start a fresh thread on the Evo tech boards.

Last edited by tenkawa_akito; Jul 30, 2003 at 11:23 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:12 AM
  #2  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
It would be a good idea to list the 4g63 stuff in the Evo tech forums by itself to avoid confusion.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #3  
tenkawa_akito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
What I'm gonna do is kinda make a faq, so if people can post some questions or parts that should be covered, over say a 1 week period, I'll compile it all, and repost a new thread with the questions and answers in an easy to navigate sort of way. So...that's till Aug 7th. get to posting!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:52 PM
  #4  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
Where to start...obnoxiously weak piston area, entirely to long con rods (which makes them awful at higher revs and they're entirely to thin as well), compression ratio just a smidgen to high for truly effective boosting, difficult camshaft removal/installation, aaaand...that's about it off the top of my head. The chassis and suspension for a compact sedan are heads and shoulders above the competition albeit the decision to have a different suspension setup between models was a poor call regardless of it saved cash money on the machine itself.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 05:11 AM
  #5  
tenkawa_akito's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
Hmm...to add to that, I would have to say brake rotors and calipers seem too small to be able to apply proper braking force at high speeds. not exactly a limitation, but something unnerving to me since i've been changing my drivebelt on the tempo way too much lately. The drivebelt chain (as in series of components, not a chain itself) looks really hard to get at, so if something were to happen to it, it would be a pain to fix. I'd hate for that alternator to go bad...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #6  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
Oooh, forgot about brakes but there is the Wilwood kit out which seems appropriate enough for boosted Lancers. As for the timing belt, if that goes it really wouldn't matter to much how hard it would be to service it because odds are you'd have some bent valves to go along with that.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:49 AM.